Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-13 Thread Karl Hammar
Andrew Poelstra: ... Cool, I see it now when compiling on a 32-bit system. It is Oh, I should have said that I tested this on a 32-bit system. caused by the BoundingBox attribute of the .eps files, which is written in 1/72. To do this, the code multiplies by 72 and then outputs in inches

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:04:47PM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote: Hey all, I have a pcb branch available here for testing: git clone git://wpsoftware.net/pcb-andrew.git git checkout coord6 You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository). It includes all the changes

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Karl Hammar
Andrew Poelstra: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: ... -#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum extent of board and elements */ +#define LARGE_VALUELONG_MAX /* (LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) maximum extent of board and elements */ ...

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:31:39PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: Andrew Poelstra: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: ... -#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum extent of board and elements */ +#define LARGE_VALUELONG_MAX /*

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 23:31:39 +0200 (CEST) k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) wrote: Andrew Poelstra: On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: ... -#define LARGE_VALUE(LONG_MAX / 2 - 1) /* maximum extent of board and elements */ +#define LARGE_VALUE

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Karl Hammar
Andrew Poelstra: ... You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository). ... And I think Karl Hammar's segfault-on-doc-compile is fixed. If not, please let me know! (Using ./autogen ./configure --with-gui=lesstif make clean make) The segfault is gone, but the missing share dir is

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread DJ Delorie
And we don't really need a signed type, do we? By using a sufficiently-large signed type, all our math is well-defined. A 32-bit signed type gives us plenty of room for today's fab limits, and if that's not enough, a central type lets us switch to 64-bit types pretty easily.

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-12 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:53:52PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: Andrew Poelstra: ... You can now pull branch coord7 (from the same repository). ... And I think Karl Hammar's segfault-on-doc-compile is fixed. If not, please let me know! (Using ./autogen ./configure --with-gui=lesstif

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-11 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:07:48PM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote: On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:04:47 -0700 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote: Please test this and let me know what needs to be done. Thanks! OK, I have noticed one bug. If I draw some lines on a copper layer, two strange things

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-11 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:44:42AM -0700, Andrew Poelstra wrote: Still happens to me on pcb-20100929-RELEASE after: ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-gui=lesstif --disable-doc --enable-maintainer-mode make clean /dev/null make /dev/null I don't know what to make of this. I guess

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-11 Thread Andrew Poelstra
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote: It seems to work after this patch also: You mean your cannot compile docs bug? I cannot reproduce that now, nor could I when you reported it. /// diff --git a/globalconst.h b/globalconst.h index 6599823..12c0592 100755 ---

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-10 Thread John Griessen
On 08/10/2011 06:04 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote: Please test this and let me know what needs to be done. Thanks! Thanks Andrew. busy til Wednesday, then will try it out. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-10 Thread Karl Hammar
Andrew Poelstra: I have a pcb branch available here for testing: git clone git://wpsoftware.net/pcb-andrew.git git checkout coord6 ... Making all in doc make[2]: Entering directory `/var/home/karl/Net/Hmm/git/pcb-andrew/doc' gawk -f ./ascii2texi.awk ncol=3 fractional_size.tab

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-10 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:04:47 -0700 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote: Please test this and let me know what needs to be done. Thanks! OK, I have noticed one bug. If I draw some lines on a copper layer, two strange things occur: (1) When I click on a line, it becomes highlighted and is

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-10 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:04:47 -0700 Andrew Poelstra as...@sfu.ca wrote: Please test this and let me know what needs to be done. Thanks! Nice work! So far it all looks great. I haven't stressed it with any fancy layouts yet, but all I can say so far is WOW and thanks for your effort. I'll let

Re: gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-10 Thread Colin D Bennett
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:16:38 +0200 (CEST) k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) wrote: Andrew Poelstra: I have a pcb branch available here for testing: git clone git://wpsoftware.net/pcb-andrew.git git checkout coord6 ... Making all in doc make[2]: Entering directory

gEDA-user: PCB nanometer git tree

2011-08-09 Thread Andrew Poelstra
Hey all, I have a pcb branch available here for testing: git clone git://wpsoftware.net/pcb-andrew.git git checkout coord6 which uses the new unit-handling code, including a metric base unit. There are probably huge glaring bugs in this. Please let me know if you see them. (Note that you