Hi all,
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:46 -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Stuart Brorson wrote:
> >
> > I am always pleased by the high level of electronics knowledge
> > displayed by the folks on this list. The contributions are very
> > interesting and educational.
> >
>
> Agreed. I'm both pleased
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:06 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:14:40 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> > I think it was
> > shut down some months ago as announced in this list, and on
>
> IIRC, it was not shut down but suffered a change of policy. Mere user
> mortals like y
> I vote to keep it. Besides the educational value, the great postings
> about electronics on geda-user are archived and searchable via
> Google. That means that folks who are searching on keywords related
> to electronics will come across the gEDA project. The high level of
> the disucssions o
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:14:40 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I think it was
> shut down some months ago as announced in this list, and on
IIRC, it was not shut down but suffered a change of policy. Mere user
mortals like you and me are not allowed to post to the list any more.
> www.gpleda.o
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:04 PM, John Griessen wrote:
>> PS I enjoy the OT's here. They're not so far out, really.
>
> Me too..
>
> -Dave
Me three.
Regards,
Mark
markra...@gmail
--
Mark Rages, Engineer
Midwest Telecine LLC
markra..
On Nov 10, 2009, at 1:04 PM, John Griessen wrote:
> PS I enjoy the OT's here. They're not so far out, really.
Me too..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cg
Dave N6NZ wrote:
If
> geda-user were split I would probably subscribe to gschem-user,
> pcb-user, geda-dev, geda-chat (for general electronics and what not) and
> not geda-sim.
>
> So, maybe split the list, but I wouldn't want to chase any of the
> current posters off.
That's such a small fr
Stuart Brorson wrote:
> Hi --
>
>> I wonder if there is a better place to ask simple electronics questions
>> like OpAmp behaviour?
>>
>> I think newsgroup sci.electronics.design is not too bad?
> [.]
>> What do you think?
>
> Just my $0.02.
>
> I am always pleased by the high level of e
Stuart Brorson wrote:
>
> I am always pleased by the high level of electronics knowledge
> displayed by the folks on this list. The contributions are very
> interesting and educational.
>
Agreed. I'm both pleased and very, very grateful.
> I vote to keep it. Besides the educational value, t
Hi --
> I wonder if there is a better place to ask simple electronics questions
> like OpAmp behaviour?
>
> I think newsgroup sci.electronics.design is not too bad?
[.]
> What do you think?
Just my $0.02.
I am always pleased by the high level of electronics knowledge
displayed by the fol
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:56 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> PS.. I found what was causing your assert failure. The gory details were
> only sent to geda-dev, but I can copy you if you want.
Great!
I can read it in the archives with my web-browser.
I noticed some days ago that geda-dev is active ag
*If* you have usenet access:
sci.electronics.basic
sci.electronics.design
There's also:
Electronics_101 at Yahoo! Groups
But traditionally the "regulars" here (geda-user) occasionally ask
design questions, as well as on #geda. Nobody seems to mind as long
as it doesn't get out of hand.
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:26 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I wonder if there is a better place to ask simple electronics questions
> like OpAmp behaviour?
>
> I think newsgroup sci.electronics.design is not too bad?
>
> For this list we already have much traffic -- user questions and some
> deve
I wonder if there is a better place to ask simple electronics questions
like OpAmp behaviour?
I think newsgroup sci.electronics.design is not too bad?
For this list we already have much traffic -- user questions and some
developer discussion. My personal view is, that it is fine to see the
talk a
14 matches
Mail list logo
