TI's sn74lvc1g240 part uses what appears dimensionally to be an ordinary
SOT25 package, but the pin numbering is different. Am I better off to
just construct my own footprint, or is there a way to deal with this at
the symbol level and still show the right pin numbers in the schematic?
I'm
Duncan Drennan wrote:
TI's sn74lvc1g240 part uses what appears dimensionally to be an ordinary
SOT25 package, but the pin numbering is different. Am I better off to
just construct my own footprint, or is there a way to deal with this at
the symbol level and still show the right pin numbers in
I would keep the footprint pin numbering consistent with the schematic
symbol
and datasheet pin numbering. If that means additional symbols and
footprints
then I would create them.
If there are differences between mfgs of the same part number then I
would attach a mfg suffix
Guys:
TI's sn74lvc1g240 part uses what appears dimensionally to be an ordinary
SOT25 package, but the pin numbering is different. Am I better off to
just construct my own footprint, or is there a way to deal with this at
the symbol level and still show the right pin numbers in the schematic?
4 matches
Mail list logo
