On 4/25/07, Stefan Dröge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does comp.cad.opensource.electronics sound to you?
Not a bad idea indeed. Leaves space for mechanical cads. I'll put it on my list.
--
Svenn
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
How does comp.cad.opensource.electronics sound to you?
Greetings, Stefan
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On 4/24/07, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not sci.electronics.cad.open ?
Contrast to s.e.open, which would be about open source electronics,
not open source eda programs.
Not a bad idea. For some reason I have been stuck with the idea that
if I would name a group sci.electronics.c
Why not sci.electronics.cad.open ?
Contrast to s.e.open, which would be about open source electronics,
not open source eda programs.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Hi,
/If/ you were to exchange experience on free and open source EDA tools
on USENET, what name for such a group would you find appealing? Users
of a major commercial tool happen to exchange experience in
comp.cad.cadence.
I think comp.cad.geda may be a bit too specific as there are xcircuit,
mag
5 matches
Mail list logo
