On Dec 26, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Stephan Boettcher
wrote:
> Stefan Salewski writes:
>
>> OK, shame on me for missing that option. But I do not think that this
>> really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete.
>
> I may believe that writing a second gschem editor is worse use of your
> tim
On Dec 26, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I do not think that this
> really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete. There are so many
> similar problems, wishful improvements. All big task currently, no one
> really does it.
What many pcb users really seem to want is a HID for sche
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> Indeed I remembered something about a Python gschem clone, I mentioned
> that in my initial post:
>
> http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Oct-2010/msg00122.html
Ouch! Sorry about that. I hardly check this mailing list nowadays.
> I was n
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 19:49 +0900, Andrzej wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Andrzej wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> >> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
> >> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Andrzej wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
>> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
>> using GTK/Cairo.
>
> I while ago I started my
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
> using GTK/Cairo.
I while ago I started my own schematics editor - pschem:
http://code.google.com/p
Stefan Salewski writes:
> OK, shame on me for missing that option. But I do not think that this
> really proves that a gschem rewrite is obsolete.
I may believe that writing a second gschem editor is worse use of your
time than improving the existing one, but it is not up to me to judge
how you
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:33 -0500, John Doty wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> > I have to modify the netlister and gschem -- gschem tries to be smart
> > and makes one single net when multiple net segments are in a straight
> > line.
>
> Doesn't putting:
>
> (net-
On Dec 26, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I have to modify the netlister and gschem -- gschem tries to be smart
> and makes one single net when multiple net segments are in a straight
> line.
Doesn't putting:
(net-consolidate "disabled")
in gschemrc fix that for your purpose in gsc
>> I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
>> profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
>>
>
> Interesting.
>
> For me no-multilib is marked with the star
Yes, the selected profile is indicated with star.
> and I do not really like to change it.
Me either,
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 14:01 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> >
> > Is your box also AMD64 no multilib profile?
>
> I did not recall what I'd installed, and it looks like no specific
> profile is set, which might be the problem in itself:
>
Interesting.
For me no-multilib is marked with the star, an
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 18:57 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
> Stefan Salewski writes:
>
>
> > I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
> > attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
> > support manually- and auto-routing with already specified pa
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:09 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>
>>
>> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb:
>> 16: GTK+ 2.8.0 or later and cairo support are required. (RuntimeError)
>>
>
> Yes, that is the same what I got befo
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:38 -0500, John Doty wrote:
> Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get
> back to Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I
> have here in Cambridge).
>
> I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
I wrote something about i
Stefan Salewski writes:
> I think one reason for start writing it was my desire to assign
> attributes/classes to subnets, to transfer this information to PCB to
> support manually- and auto-routing with already specified parameters for
> traces.
Why do you need a gschem replacement for that?
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 12:09 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb:
> 16: GTK+ 2.8.0 or later and cairo support are required. (RuntimeError)
>
Yes, that is the same what I got before fixing it by manually installing
rb_cairo.h.
The Gentoo people
Stephan, this project is interesting. I'll try it on Ubuntu when I get back to
Noqsi. I think I'll pass on trying it on a Mac for now (all I have here in
Cambridge).
I am puzzled, however, by your motivation:
On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:48 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> I think one reason for start w
> Or try
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
>
> Should fail too, with the same message as my script.
> All related to the missing rb_cairo.h -- some Gentoo people seem to
> think that it is obsolete, but it seems to be needed on some boxes.
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 17:47 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Please try to execute
>
> /usr/share/doc/ruby-pango-0.19.4/sample/pango_cairo.rb
>
>
> If that fails, please add some comment to above bug reports.
>
Or try
/usr/share/doc/ruby-gtk2-0.19.4/sample/misc/cairo-pong.rb
Should fail too,
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
>> > I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
>> > from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
>> > with distributions like U
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 11:30 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> > I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
> > from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
> > with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
> > to install
> I would be interested how many people can run the demo script (peted.rb)
> from the top of the above page. Are the needed rcairo bindings shipped
> with distributions like Ubuntu? If not, then it may be easier for people
> to install the whole gEDA package than to get such a short ruby script
>
Hi Stefan,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Salewski
> Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 2:49 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Working on a tiny schemat
On Sun, 2010-12-26 at 09:28 -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote:
> Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
> some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
>
Fine!
> Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
> line heights or the left/right ver
Ran without any user intervention on Fedora 13. Installed Ruby
some time ago without knowing if I would ever use it.
Depending on the window sizing, either the top/bottom horizontal
line heights or the left/right vertical line widths do not display fully.
George
On 12/26/2010 08:48 AM, Stefan S
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 19:31 +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
> compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
> using GTK/Cairo.
>
No, the project is not death...
I just managed to draw to a GTK drawing area,
On 10/07/2010 09:36 PM, Steve Morss wrote:
Go for it! I think your idea is really neat. I'm a hard core Ruby programmer
and have had similar experiences - you can say a
lot in a little bit of space, the code is very readable, and coding goes
quickly.
On 10/7/10 1:31 PM, Stefan Salewski wro
Go for it! I think your idea is really neat. I'm a hard core Ruby
programmer and have had similar experiences - you can say a lot in a
little bit of space, the code is very readable, and coding goes
quickly. I can think of some other useful applications for a Ruby
version of gschem. A smal
Some weeks ago I started working on a very basic schematics editor,
compatible with current gschem file format. I am writing it in Ruby,
using GTK/Cairo.
You may ask: Do we really need one?
No, gschem works fine.
You may say: That is wasting of your time.
Maybe...
You may say: You should bette
29 matches
Mail list logo
