Re: gEDA-user: changes to 0603 footprint?

2007-02-14 Thread John Griessen
Dan McMahill wrote: With an 0603, there really isn't much room for silk. You'll see that silk is there on the larger ones, I think starting with maybe 1008 or 1206. For prototypes and small runs, the laser cut stencil companies also make laser cut plastic guides with burned in refdes labels

Re: gEDA-user: changes to 0603 footprint?

2007-02-13 Thread DJ Delorie
> I'll betcha that there are some SMT passives with silk outlines on > gedasymbols.org too. I just haven't looked. http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/2pad.html ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-

Re: gEDA-user: changes to 0603 footprint?

2007-02-13 Thread Stuart Brorson
Matt Ettus wrote: At some point the 0603 footprint in the CVS version of PCB lost the silkscreen rectangle around it. Is there any reason it went away? Was this intentional? yes. It was brought more inline with IPC footprints instead of the homegrown one that was there. With an 0603, there

Re: gEDA-user: changes to 0603 footprint?

2007-02-13 Thread Dan McMahill
Matt Ettus wrote: At some point the 0603 footprint in the CVS version of PCB lost the silkscreen rectangle around it. Is there any reason it went away? Was this intentional? yes. It was brought more inline with IPC footprints instead of the homegrown one that was there. With an 0603, there

gEDA-user: changes to 0603 footprint?

2007-02-13 Thread Matt Ettus
At some point the 0603 footprint in the CVS version of PCB lost the silkscreen rectangle around it. Is there any reason it went away? Was this intentional? ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf