Re: gEDA-user: geda 1.4.0 in Hardy - is xgsch2pcb supposed to work now?

2008-08-02 Thread Kai-Martin Knaak
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:37:27 -0500, Martin Maney wrote: >> Use the git version of xgsch2pcb. > > I'm already chasing more development snapshots than I can really find > time for, so I guess the pragmatic choice is to go back to the old way > of doing things. Maybe next year... There is a summer

Re: gEDA-user: geda 1.4.0 in Hardy - is xgsch2pcb supposed to work now?

2008-08-01 Thread Martin Maney
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:28:51PM +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote: > The secret is that the required functionality was only added to xgsch2pcb > recently. ... > Use the git version of xgsch2pcb. I'm already chasing more development snapshots than I can really find time for, so I guess the pragma

Re: gEDA-user: geda 1.4.0 in Hardy - is xgsch2pcb supposed to work now?

2008-08-01 Thread Peter TB Brett
On Friday 01 August 2008 23:15:13 Martin Maney wrote: > So what's the secret? Or is this just something that needs another > year of simmering, as I think someone put it about a year ago? The secret is that the required functionality was only added to xgsch2pcb recently. For now, the best bet

gEDA-user: geda 1.4.0 in Hardy - is xgsch2pcb supposed to work now?

2008-08-01 Thread Martin Maney
Having as my main - and not pleasant - memory of using the geda/PCB tools half a year ago be the incredibly annoying repetitive typing of commands (both at the normal CLI, where the really common ones could be scripted, as well as inside PCB, where... well, I never did, anyway), I thought I'd tak