Currently this may be too much of an honor - I have about no time
to maintain that space. Furthermore I'm satisfied with my name
as author, if a footprint makes it into the general library.
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Armin Faltl wrote:
since the library version footprint MSOP10.fp seems to be
Armin Faltl wrote:
Furthermore I'm satisfied with my name
as author, if a footprint makes it into the general library.
Currently, no footprint makes it to the default lib ...
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
Universität Hannover,
Hi,
since the library version footprint MSOP10.fp seems to be
very unprecise, I made my own, which is included below.
The major difference is in the spacing of pads.
Regards, Armin
MSOP10_ajf.fp
Description: application/pcb-footprint
___
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:01 +0200, Armin Faltl wrote:
Hi,
since the library version footprint MSOP10.fp seems to be
very unprecise, I made my own, which is included below.
The major difference is in the spacing of pads.
Regards, Armin
very unprecise,
Please try to give more detailed
Stefan Salewski wrote:
Please try to give more detailed error reports -- if that one is really
wrong, we should remove it.
The spacing of pads in the library footprint, checked visually and in
the editor is very uneven.
The centers of the pads are off the theoretical 0.5mm pitch by 0.1mm or
Armin Faltl wrote:
since the library version footprint MSOP10.fp seems to be
very unprecise, I made my own, which is included below.
How about an Armin_Faltl section in http://www.gedasymbols.org/ ?
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895
6 matches
Mail list logo