On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Ben Jackson b...@ben.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 05:41:05PM -0800, Ben Jackson wrote:
I meant automatic solutions which would enforce the normal DRC rules on
the slivers, eliminating any smaller than the minimum trace width.
(replying to myself)
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 18:04 -0800, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 05:41:05PM -0800, Ben Jackson wrote:
I meant automatic solutions which would enforce the normal DRC rules on
the slivers, eliminating any smaller than the minimum trace width.
(replying to myself)
Actually,
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 16:30 -0800, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:24:27PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of
copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines to
squeeze out
the slivers. I've considered several times how to fix this, and
I
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 12:51 -0500, Harry Eaton wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of
copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines to
squeeze out
the slivers. I've
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 05:14:31PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:24:27PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Harry Eaton wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines to squeeze out
the slivers. I've considered several times how to fix this, and I can
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:28:05PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
This sounds like the solution. Do you have any sample code or pseudocode
on how to do it?
Something like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotating_calipers or one of the
references from that article is probably on point.
--
Ben
i dont use geda and i looked at attached pdf. is this rly de3ault
behaviour for pours and cant be changed?
On 1/11/10, Ben Jackson b...@ben.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:28:05PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
This sounds like the solution. Do you have any sample code or pseudocode
on
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 05:41:05PM -0800, Ben Jackson wrote:
I meant automatic solutions which would enforce the normal DRC rules on
the slivers, eliminating any smaller than the minimum trace width.
(replying to myself)
Actually, I think I just figured out how to fix it AND do it live.
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between traces when doing pours?
--
David Griffith
dgri...@cs.csubak.edu
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:24:27PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines to squeeze out
the slivers. I've considered several times
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Ben Jackson wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:24:27PM -0800, David Griffith wrote:
Is there some way I can easily get rid of the little slivers of copper
left between traces when doing pours?
Not without adjusting the clearance on the adjacent lines to squeeze out
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
