Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Stefan Salewski:
>
> I think pinseq is not really needed, if I remember correctly DJ's
> djboxsym does not write a pinseq. pinseq may be needed for spice
> simulation tools.
Sorry, that was wrong.
djboxsym was not writing pintypes which gave gsym
Stuart Brorson wrote:
>> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
>> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
>> wasn't that much work.
>
> Pretty easy is right.
>
>> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
>
> Quit yer whining
On Mar 11, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 17:35:21 John Doty wrote:
>
>> And all of the crazy IEC417 symbols (whose pins aren't real anyway).
>
> Now that I have my own set of nicely-matching lightweight symbols,
> the only
> syms I really use from the gED
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 17:35:21 John Doty wrote:
> And all of the crazy IEC417 symbols (whose pins aren't real anyway).
Now that I have my own set of nicely-matching lightweight symbols, the only
syms I really use from the gEDA symbols package are the IEC417 ones... really
useful for block
On Mar 11, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
>>> H maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
>>>
>>> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. Maybe people will complain less
>>> if it's fixed.
>>
>> Wh
H ?maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. ?Maybe people will complain less
if it's fixed.
Who ever removes the text that states that pinseq= is a requirement,
please actua
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
>> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
>> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
>> wasn't that much work.
>
> Pretty easy is right.
>
>> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq
[snip]
> H maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
>
> I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. Maybe people will complain less
> if it's fixed.
Who ever removes the text that states that pinseq= is a requiremen
> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
> wasn't that much work.
Pretty easy is right.
> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
Quit yer whining.
Pinseq is not used unless you hav
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 16:36 +0100 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause:
> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
> wasn't that much work. However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
>
> Phi
Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
wasn't that much work. However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
Philipp
___
geda-user mailing list
ged
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 13:42 +0100 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause:
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list sys that each pin
> needs both a pinnumber and a pinseq. Why? Just so everyone who creates
> a symbol using gschem has to click and type twice as much? Is there some
> too
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list sys that each pin
needs both a pinnumber and a pinseq. Why? Just so everyone who creates
a symbol using gschem has to click and type twice as much? Is there some
tool that just duplicates the values of pinnumber into pinseq?
Philipp
13 matches
Mail list logo
