On 2/20/11, Stephen Ecob silicon.on.inspirat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Congrats to your new status!
The geda project got a new dev!
This is really good news :-)
+1 :-)
Thanks to the whole community!
On Feb 21 2011, Ineiev wrote:
Pushed to git-head.
Thanks,
Ineiev
Awesome - welcome to the development team. Feel free to ping me if there
were any outstanding review issues you wanted me to look at with any of
your existing patches.
I feel very guilty I've not managed to get more of your
Peter Clifton:
...
generate, and setup .ssh/config with these lines:
Host git.gpleda.org
Port 5022
RSAAuthentication yes
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/keys/id_rsa.gpleda.org
...
Don't you know that protocol version 1 i vulnerable for a
man-in-the-middle attack?
$ man ssh_config |
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 10:36 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
Peter Clifton:
...
generate, and setup .ssh/config with these lines:
Host git.gpleda.org
Port 5022
RSAAuthentication yes
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/keys/id_rsa.gpleda.org
...
Don't you know that protocol version
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes:
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 10:36 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
Peter Clifton:
...
generate, and setup .ssh/config with these lines:
Host git.gpleda.org
Port 5022
RSAAuthentication yes
IdentityFile ~/.ssh/keys/id_rsa.gpleda.org
...
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 13:28 +0100, Stephan Boettcher wrote:
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes:
id_rsa is a version 2 key.
The RSAAuthentication may be used for version 1 only, but that does not
mean specifying it makes ssh to use version 1.
Do ssh -v git.gpleda.org to see which
Stephan:
Peter Clifton pc...@cam.ac.uk writes:
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 10:36 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
...
Don't you know that protocol version 1 i vulnerable for a
man-in-the-middle attack?
No, I didn't know that.
Does it require a different type of key to be generated and used, or
k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) writes:
Stephan:
Do ssh -v git.gpleda.org to see which version is used. Most default
sshd installations do not permit protocol version 1.
Can't test that:
$ ssh -v git.gpleda.org
OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5, OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
debug1: Reading
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 14:49 +0100, Karl Hammar wrote:
Protocol 2
RhostsRSAAuthentication no
RSAAuthentication no
For my local machine, I have that, but with:
RSAAuthentication yes
RSAAuthentication
Specifies whether pure RSA authentication is allowed. The
Ineiev wrote:
I made a wrong assumption (segs variable should be at least 1).
diff --git a/src/polygon.c b/src/polygon.c
I can confirm, that this patch removes the problem both in git-head
and in Peters gl version. :-)
On minor nit: The wasn't attached but part of the body of the email.
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
I can confirm, that this patch removes the problem both in git-head
and in Peters gl version. :-)
Thank you!
On minor nit: The wasn't attached but part of the body of the email.
So I had to copy-pasted it to a patch file. This patch file did not
apply right away. The
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Ineiev wrote:
I made a wrong assumption (segs variable should be at least 1).
diff --git a/src/polygon.c b/src/polygon.c
I can confirm, that this patch removes the problem both in git-head
and in Peters gl version. :-)
Pushed to git-head.
Thanks,
Ineiev
Ineiev wrote:
Pushed to git-head.
Great!
Congrats to your new status!
The geda project got a new dev!
This is really good news :-)
---)kaimartin(---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak k...@lilalaser.de wrote:
Ineiev wrote:
Pushed to git-head.
Great!
Congrats to your new status!
The geda project got a new dev!
This is really good news :-)
+1 :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
Woo Hoo!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
True! I was just wondering if you ran into the same issues I just
found with rebasing.
It also makes it nearly impossible to maintain your own
branch based off the pcb+gl branch since it will constantly be
diverging.
Use stgit and rebase yourself - that would work.
I just have
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 05:27 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The current head of his pcb+gl branch omits some polygons in my layouts.
See the attached screen shots. The working copy of pcb+gl was pulled from
repo.or.cz on December 6th. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to locate the
the exact
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 05:27 +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
The current head of his pcb+gl branch omits some polygons in my layouts.
See the attached screen shots. The working copy of pcb+gl was pulled from
repo.or.cz on December 6th. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to locate
On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 19:02 +, Ineiev wrote:
Any ideas why?
I made a wrong assumption (segs variable should be at least 1).
Neat - you got to a fix quicker than I would have!
Lets make this your first commit once you get a developer account setup.
You will need to provide Ales the
Colin D Bennett wrote:
The git history is a litte muddled...
When you say it's a little muddled, do you think that if it wasn't
rebased constantly that the history would be clearer?
Probably. But I am not the one who has to deal with the the development
tree.
It also makes it nearly
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:12:36 +0100
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
Colin D Bennett wrote:
The git history is a litte muddled...
When you say it's a little muddled, do you think that if it wasn't
rebased constantly that the history would be clearer?
Probably. But
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:27:29 +0100
Kai-Martin Knaak kn...@iqo.uni-hannover.de wrote:
This may be mainly for Peter Clifton:
The current head of his pcb+gl branch omits some polygons in my
layouts. See the attached screen shots. The working copy of pcb+gl
was pulled from repo.or.cz on December
22 matches
Mail list logo
