> Was looking at the 01005 caps. I was wondering if that as small as
> they get, or can they get smaller? Reflow soldering and robotics
> would odviously be needed. Just Curious.
I don't know of anything smaller, and certainly nothing at digikey or
mouser is. As for reflow and robotics, they e
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:08:04 -0400
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 29 remain unclaimed. If you've mailed me a check, please email me
> [not the list] and let me know how many to reserve for you so I don't
> run out too soon. Also, if you want to pick one up at the next
> Freedaug meet
On Nov 1, 2006, at 4:52 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
John has it correct.
Well, kinda. I really shouldn't try to explain physics before morning
tea ;-)
I should have said "a vacant negative energy state of a negatively
charged particle has the same dynamics as an occupied positive energy
st
Positrons are easier to detect then 01005 capacitors.
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:59 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > The discovery of the Positron. Seems a bit far removed from EDA, though...
>
> Positrons are only slightly smaller than 01005 capacitors.
>
>
>
Bill,
Thanks for the reference.
Steve M.
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 16:40 +0100, Bill Sloman wrote:
> At 05:25 1-11-2006, you wrote:
> >I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
> >"Quantum Theory" translated into English in 1930.
> >
> >"Dirac has set up a wave equation wh
> The discovery of the Positron. Seems a bit far removed from EDA, though...
Positrons are only slightly smaller than 01005 capacitors.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
John has it correct.
It is facinating reading this text. A modern quantum physics book
presents the theory as cold hard fact... but back in 1930 when it was
brand new Heisenberg was presenting it in an almost appoligetic and not
quite sure manner.
Steve M.
John Doty wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2006,
At 05:25 1-11-2006, you wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
"Quantum Theory" translated into English in 1930.
"Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirement
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
"Quantum Theory" translated into English in 1930.
"Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron
and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fu
Steve Meier wrote:
So what was wrong? What occured that proved both theories were correct?
The discovery of the Positron. Seems a bit far removed from EDA, though...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/ma
I will give you all a couple of clues..
The equation garbled as it may be is the more complex version of E = M*C^2
Next go see who received the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1936.
Steve Meier wrote:
>I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's "Quantum
>Theory" translated
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 23:25, Steve Meier wrote:
> I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
> "Quantum Theory" translated into English in 1930.
> Here spontaneuos transitions may occure to the states of negative energy; as
> these have never been observed
Perhaps.
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's "Quantum
Theory" translated into English in 1930.
"Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirements of the quantum theory, and is
I think I will drop into this group a brief passage fom Heisenberg's
"Quantum Theory" translated into English in 1930.
"Dirac has set up a wave equation which is valid for one electron and is
invarient under the Lorentian transformation. It fulfills all
requirements of the quantum theory, and is a
My tech got his together other then those 01005's which were apperently
used to fill a couple of pico black holes.
Steve M.
Bob Paddock wrote:
>On Tuesday 31 October 2006 13:25, Mark Rages wrote:
>
>>>And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
>>>success stories :-)
>>
I suppose so... I ripped mine right open.
The lands for the 01 05 's are verry teeny
I'll maybe sharpen my soldering iron
I need some fine solder wick.
Shopping to do...
John G
Mark Rages wrote:
And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success s
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 13:25, Mark Rages wrote:
> > And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
> > success stories :-)
>
> Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope? It just sits on my
> workbench, mocking me.
I just opened my ten pack. Ten individual kits of p
Be very very afriad of those 01005 capacitors... They seem to be virtual
quantum devices... either you know where they are or you don't. Seeing
as they have very small mass the heisenberg uncertainty principle is
working against you in that they are likely to soon be some where else.
Steve M.
On
I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northeast US may get
them tomorrow, else you'll start getting them next week.
And I'm interested in hearing your initial reactions, as well as any
success stories :-)
Am I the only one afraid to open the envelope? It just sits on my
workbench, mo
29 remain unclaimed. If you've mailed me a check, please email me
[not the list] and let me know how many to reserve for you so I don't
run out too soon. Also, if you want to pick one up at the next
Freedaug meeting, email me for that too.
I sent out a big bunch yesterday; people in the northea
> A Hong Kong/Chinese board fabber, YukShing Circuits, sent me some
> FR-1
Not sure I want to hand-make that many precision boards.
If I were to product-ize it, I'd go with a larger single-sided board.
You still want the solder mask, I think, although it's hard to squeeze
it between the IC pins.
DJ Delorie wrote:
I'll give some feed back to that. I was planing on ordering ten.
Not that I'm that bad at soldering, but some people at work could use
some practice.
Note that ten packs aren't cut up; you'll need a scroll saw or other
pcb cutter with a narrow kerf. I use a #2 blade. I'm g
> > FYI: They still throb too fast to see (30Hz). Those caps are not very
> > precise.
>
>U? What's their tolerance spec?
They're X5R's, rated at 10%.
That board is going about 700Hz+, so they're 5% off, but I've seen
them up to 20% off when measuring them with my multimeter, not
Dave McGuire wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:26 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I wonder if you can hand-solder SOJ if you start by putting solder
paste on the pads, so that you use the tip to reflow the paste?
I've done this with a hot-air pencil. I find it a bit easier than
doing SOJs with an iron
On Oct 21, 2006, at 12:04 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Hey! It works! And no injection locking either.
Schweet!
Yeah, that was definitely a pleasant surprise.
Not that I can explain it, of course.
But now I have to reconfigure my latest board to use the twin slow
oscillators, so I can see the
> > Hey! It works! And no injection locking either.
>
>Schweet!
Yeah, that was definitely a pleasant surprise.
Not that I can explain it, of course.
But now I have to reconfigure my latest board to use the twin slow
oscillators, so I can see the LEDs throb. That means moving one of
the
On Oct 20, 2006, at 10:26 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Won't two AA's power this rather than messing with a 9V and 7805?
Hey! It works! And no injection locking either.
Schweet!
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Cape Coral, FL
___
geda-user mailing li
> Won't two AA's power this rather than messing with a 9V and 7805?
Hey! It works! And no injection locking either.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> I'll give some feed back to that. I was planing on ordering ten.
> Not that I'm that bad at soldering, but some people at work could use
> some practice.
Note that ten packs aren't cut up; you'll need a scroll saw or other
pcb cutter with a narrow kerf. I use a #2 blade. I'm going to cut up
t
On Friday 20 October 2006 20:45, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I haven't gotten any feedback about the "limit two per person" either.
I'll give some feed back to that. I was planing on ordering ten.
Not that I'm that bad at soldering, but some people at work could use
some practice.
Also on the $0.37 surc
> In instructions.pdf, Quantities in the table don't match the board or the
> resdef numbers.
> C2-5 Qty 2 -> should be 4
There are two oscillator configurations, so the schematic has two
places for caps for each oscillator. You only populate one each.
This is noted in the instructions. I add
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:01:23 -0400
DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One step left before I start taking orders. Almost there!
>
> I've pretty much finished the web page and instructions for the
> challenge board project, and would like to request a review.
> Specifically, the link mark
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:26 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I wonder if you can hand-solder SOJ if you start by putting solder
paste on the pads, so that you use the tip to reflow the paste?
I've done this with a hot-air pencil. I find it a bit easier than
doing SOJs with an iron and wire solder. I've
> yeah, I've never liked soldering SOJ's. Although I'd rather do
> those than QFN's.
I'd have preferred tsops, but I can do trace-between-pads with SOJ,
and I was kinda limited given the part I needed (5v SRAM).
I wonder if you can hand-solder SOJ if you start by putting solder
paste on the pad
DJ Delorie wrote:
I've built three so far (two proto, one final). I'm going to use one
or two more finals to try out my new hot plate before I start working
on the expansion board project (the SOJs almost require reflow). So,
I can't wait to get rid of them all ;-) (and I'm not going smaller
t
> 2nd paragraph. "There's all sorts of things" should probably be
> "There are all sorts of things".
Fixed.
> "from the time the parts get here" should maybe "from the time the
> parts get there".
I meant *my house*. From the time the parts leave Digikey to the time
you finish assembling your
DJ Delorie wrote:
One step left before I start taking orders. Almost there!
I've pretty much finished the web page and instructions for the
challenge board project, and would like to request a review.
Specifically, the link marked "instruction sheet" is the [double
sided] page I'm including wit
One step left before I start taking orders. Almost there!
I've pretty much finished the web page and instructions for the
challenge board project, and would like to request a review.
Specifically, the link marked "instruction sheet" is the [double
sided] page I'm including with the mailed kits.
38 matches
Mail list logo
