On Wednesday 06 April 2005 23:16, Gene Heskett wrote:
<>
> Thats another of the programs I make from tarballs. Using k3b also,
> all I can say is that it Just Works(TM). Just Works great that is.
Same here. The version that ships with SuSE (9.0, 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3) is badly
broken - Like
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:33, Marvin Dickens wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:37, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:27:15PM -0400, Marvin Dickens wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 18:53, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
>> > > The individual pieces of software (pkg-config, auto
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:37, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:27:15PM -0400, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 18:53, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> > > The individual pieces of software (pkg-config, autoconf etc) all have
> > > very detailed documentation but tha
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:27:15PM -0400, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 18:53, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> > The individual pieces of software (pkg-config, autoconf etc) all have
> > very detailed documentation but that typically not what the end user
> > needs to know in order to
sorry for the onslaught of questions recently. i'm really working
hard on a few things and i keep coming across new features i would
like to utilize. now i can't seem to get busses to do what i want...
regarding the graphic eq example, say i have a "filter bank" symbol
consisting of 8 bandpass f
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 18:53, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:13:45AM -0400, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> > Thing is, I like to install from source. So, regardless if the distro
> > uses apt, rpm or whatever, I'm still hoarked - RPM and apt only know
> > about their packages and h
it appears the hierarchical component naming convention is as
described and (im assuming) unavoidable. it doesnt bother me at all
though. i've gotten it working now thanks to the gTAG example. man,
this is a VERY NICE feature. had i not been an idiot and already
copied the filters a billion tim
I am trying to build the 20050313 suite of gschem from sources,
and libgeda is giving me grief.
The distro is Mandrake 10.0. It is possible I have broken something
by installing later versions of various libraries from non-RPM tarballs
over time. I am using noweb 2.10a.
Any pointers appreciate
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:13:45AM -0400, Marvin Dickens wrote:
> Thing is, I like to install from source. So, regardless if the distro
> uses apt, rpm or whatever, I'm still hoarked - RPM and apt only know
> about their packages and have no knowledge of things installed from source.
> Even Gentoo
On Apr 6, 2005 5:39 PM, handsome greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how could you make a "filter" schematic, which is repeated say 10
> times in a "filter bank" schematic. finally, how could you make 2
> "filter banks" show up in the main schematic (block diagram basically)
> - one for each channel
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 12:02, Marvin Dickens wrote:
>On Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> What other list? My kmail list of lists is slightly more than 1
>> screen high, about 37 at last count. :-)
>
>The Fedora Core list, among others.
>
Oh, well on balance, I'm afraid I a
> how does one go about utilizing the hierarchy. i see in the cvs
> version of gschem that it has the option to traverse a hierarchy, but
> how do you create one? for example, building a stereo graphic eq...
>
> how could you make a "filter" schematic, which is repeated say 10
> times in a "fi
how does one go about utilizing the hierarchy. i see in the cvs
version of gschem that it has the option to traverse a hierarchy, but
how do you create one? for example, building a stereo graphic eq...
how could you make a "filter" schematic, which is repeated say 10
times in a "filter bank" sch
I have no problems with using gschem here. So maybe you can try to use
the
gschem-deb's from debian/unstable.
Indeed, "apt-get -t unstable install ..." worked like a charm. Thanks
for the pointer. Would be nice to have a working testing version, but
I'm happy for now. :)
-Chris
Jan Wagemakers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Christopher K Eveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef:
>
> > I'm running an up-to-date debian testing system.
>
> I am using Debian/unstable.
>
> > % gschem
> > gEDA/gschem version 20040111
> > gEDA/gschem comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 11:52, Gene Heskett wrote:
> What other list? My kmail list of lists is slightly more than 1
> screen high, about 37 at last count. :-)
The Fedora Core list, among others.
Regards
Marvin
Christopher K Eveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef:
> I'm running an up-to-date debian testing system.
I am using Debian/unstable.
> % gschem
> gEDA/gschem version 20040111
> gEDA/gschem comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more
> details.
pts/2836 jan ~$ gschem
gEDA/gschem ver
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 07:41, Leva wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:45 -0400
>
>Marvin Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> about their packages and have no knowledge of things installed
>> from source.
>
>You can create/install pseudo packages to correct this. Read the apt
> or some Debian ho
> I see that some other people have had problems getting gEDA working
> from debian packages, but my problems seem a bit different, so here
> goes:
>
> I'm running an up-to-date debian testing system. When I do the
> following:
>
> # apt-get install geda geda-doc geda-examples geda-gnetlist g
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 00:13, Marvin Dickens wrote:
>On Tuesday 05 April 2005 22:24, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 April 2005 21:57, Daniel Nilsson wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:22:14AM -0400, Charles Lepple wrote:
>> >> On Apr 4, 2005 12:52 AM, Gene Heskett
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi-
I see that some other people have had problems getting gEDA working
from debian packages, but my problems seem a bit different, so here
goes:
I'm running an up-to-date debian testing system. When I do the
following:
# apt-get install geda geda-doc geda-examples geda-gnetlist geda-gschem
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:13:45 -0400
Marvin Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> about their packages and have no knowledge of things installed from source.
You can create/install pseudo packages to correct this. Read the apt or some
Debian howto.
Levente
__
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: ha5ogl
Hi Bill,
many thanks - now I understand - and - with your hints it works not to bad!
I'm very glad, because I could correct a big mistake in one of my new
footprints ;-)
Best Regards
Manfred
23 matches
Mail list logo
