> Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:22 am, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
>
> Can we take this off-list, please?
Illegal use of proprietary software i
On 11/2/05, Martin, AA6E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To complete this story, I couldn't get a full install on FC4, even using
> CC=gcc32 and CXX=g++32. Some library issue. That's not gEDA's fault, in my
> view. Changing compilers is always a challenge. This is the downside of
> trying to use a b
Thanks for the report. I will put your notes about g++ into the Wiki
soon -- unless you get a wiki password and beat me to it!
Would you care to elaborate on what the library problem was?
Finally, FWIW, I have a private build of the installer on which
everything works *except* Icarus Verilog. M
To complete this story, I couldn't get a full install on FC4, even
using CC=gcc32 and CXX=g++32. Some library issue. That's not gEDA's
fault, in my view. Changing compilers is always a
challenge. This is the downside of trying to use a big
application suite in a dynamic distribution like Fedora.
On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
Can we take this off-list, please?
Speaking of which...
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire"You'll have to be a lot more sp
On 11/2/05, antonio bergnoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> antonio bergnoli ha scritto:
> > what are srokes?
> ^
> |
> .. oops!! strokes
The libstroke web page describes it better than I can:
http://www.etla.net/libstroke/
but it's sort of like a cross between your m
antonio bergnoli ha scritto:
what are srokes?
^
|
.. oops!! strokes
--
Antonio Bergnoli
INFN Sez Padova
Via Marzolo n.8
35131 Padova ITALY
Tel +39 049 827 7093
Cell +39 328 232 8803
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
what are srokes?
Xtian Xultz ha scritto:
Em Qua 02 Nov 2005 13:00, Wojciech Kazubski escreveu:
Hello!
Is anybody using strokes in gschem?
Wojciech Kazubski
A friend of mine uses. I never liked it.
--
Antonio Bergnoli
INFN Sez Padova
Via Marzolo n.8
35131 Padova ITALY
Tel +39 049 827
Well, it's important that pinseq (1, 2, 3, 4) correspond to (C, B, E, S)
for SPICE et al. (substrate optional, of course). Pin numbers should be
determined by the package (if any). CBE are nice as pinlabels.
So, for pinseq, it's best to consult the SPICE or SPICE library docs. For
pin numbers, con
Em Qua 02 Nov 2005 13:00, Wojciech Kazubski escreveu:
> Hello!
>
> Is anybody using strokes in gschem?
>
> Wojciech Kazubski
A friend of mine uses. I never liked it.
Darrell Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights.
That is your opinion. Others have the right to disagree.
Can we take this off-list, please?
MS
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Kov=E1cs?= Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing is that from Altera, you CAN download code for Windows, but
> not for linux.
As I've said, I've got mine through some social engineering.
> Can you make a copy, and send it to me? :-)
Yes, of course! I offer free copies t
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Paddock wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 November 2005 05:32 pm, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > > In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most
> > > of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more
> > > modifications without having to insta
Is there any convention how symbols and packages of transistors should
be done in gEDA? CBE or 123?
If yes, is it written anywhere?
CL<
Hello!
Is anybody using strokes in gschem?
Wojciech Kazubski
15 matches
Mail list logo
