White House concedes Russia meddled in campaign, but denies it changed the 
result

 Hunter Walker 6 hours ago    
   - Reactions
    
   - Like
    
   - Reblog on Tumblr
    
   - Share
    
   - Tweet
    
   - Email

  
|  
|   
|   
|   |    |

   |

  |
|  
|    |  
White House concedes Russia meddled in campaign, but denies it changed the ...
 The White House Thursday addressed the joint intelligence report that found 
Russia had attempted to interfere wi...  |   |

  |

  |

 
Photo illustration: Yahoo News. Photos: AP, TwitterWASHINGTON — The White House 
Thursday addressed the joint intelligence report that found Russia had 
attempted to interfere with the 2016 presidential election, more than five 
months after the report’s conclusions were made public. First, on Twitter, 
President Trump dismissed the concerns about Russia as a “big Dem HOAX” and 
suggested that his predecessor, President Barack Obama, did little to confront 
the problem. White House aides then clarified Trump’s remarks and said he 
believes there was Russian meddling but is certain it did not affect the 
outcome of the race.Trump had previously suggested that the questions about 
Russia’s involvement in the election were overblown and “fake news.” As 
recently as Tuesday, press secretary Sean Spicer declined to answer a question 
at the White House briefing about whether Trump believes Russia interfered in 
the presidential race. Spicer said he and Trump had “not sat down and talked … 
about that specific thing.” Spicer and his deputy, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, 
frequently deflect questions about contentious issues by saying they haven’t 
spoken to the president about them.The public version of the intelligence 
community’s election assessment, which was released in January and was compiled 
by all 17 of America’s intelligence agencies, concluded that Russian President 
Vladimir Putin personally ordered the campaign interference. According to the 
report, the Russian effort included email hacks on the campaign of Trump’s 
Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National Committee. The 
agencies said information from those hacks was released to hurt the Democrats 
and boost Trump, but the report specified that it “did not make an assessment 
of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 
election.”On Thursday, shortly before Sanders was scheduled to hold a briefing, 
Trump sent out a series of tweets about Russian intervention where he described 
it as “a big Dem HOAX!” and a “big Dem scam and excuse for losing the 
election!” Trump pointed to the fact the DNC did not turn over its computer 
servers to the FBI to look at for evidence. The bureau has said it was able to 
get the information it needed from computer security firms that analyzed those 
servers. Trump also alluded to former Department of Homeland Security Secretary 
Jeh Johnson’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee where Johnson 
said he was not aware of evidence Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia.



In the Thursday briefing, Sanders was asked whether Trump’s tweets were meant 
to dispute the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia interfered in 
the election. She referred to prior statements from Trump and said he was clear 
it “probably was Russia.”“I believe that the president said even back in 
January and I’ll read the statement from then, that he thinks it’s a disgrace, 
thinks its an absolute disgrace. ‘As far as hacking, I think it was Russia, but 
I think we also get hacked by other countries and other people,’” Sanders said. 
“I think he’s made it clear and been consistent that, while everyone agrees the 
result of the election wasn’t influenced, he thinks that it probably was 
Russia.”The intelligence community report did not include any assessment of 
whether Russian hacking actually influenced the election result.Sanders went on 
to say Trump is very concerned about protecting “the integrity of the electoral 
system” and pointed to his support for voter identification laws and a 
commission on “voter integrity.”Yahoo News asked Sanders if in dismissing the 
hacking issue as a “big Dem HOAX!” Trump was implying that members of the 
intelligence community who compiled the report had colluded with the Democrats. 
Sanders clarified that Trump was not referring to the “hack itself” as a hoax, 
and that his tweets were directed at insinuations that the Russian intervention 
called his election victory into question.“I think that the reference in the 
hoax is about the fact that they’re trying to delegitimize his win in the 
election process and less about the hack itself. I think he’s said several 
times now that he believes that Russia was part of it,” Sanders said. “Some of 
those same members have said that they don’t think it influenced the election, 
and I think that’s what a lot of this process is about. It’s about trying to 
make excuses for why Democrats lost and the president … has been pretty clear 
on where he stands with that.”

Kirim email ke