Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2341: mem: write streaming support via WriteInvalidate promotion

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2341/ --- (Updated Aug. 14, 2014, 7:54 a.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

[gem5-dev] Cron m5test@zizzer /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/simple-timing passed.= Output differences = * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-atomic-mp passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-timing-mp passed. *

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2319: Mem: adding architectural page table support for SE mode

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2319/#review5246 --- src/arch/x86/pagetable.hh http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2319/#comment4785

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2312: Mem: adding a multi-level page table class

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2312/#review5245 --- src/mem/multi_level_page_table.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2322: SegInit, x86: Segment initialization to support KvmCPU in SE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2322/#review5249 --- Ship it! src/sim/process.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/#review5250 --- I'm really not happy about the use of kvm-specific ports magic here. It

Re: [gem5-dev] DRAMPower with gem5

Hi Andreas, Thank you, really appreciate the support you have given me now I am able to successfully compute my results. Cheers! On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev gem5-dev@gem5.org wrote: Hi Hussain, I suspect you are running in atomic mode, in which case the

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2312: Mem: adding a multi-level page table class

On Aug. 14, 2014, 9:28 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: src/mem/page_table.hh, line 71 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2312/diff/2/?file=40432#file40432line71 Any particular reason why these aren't const any more? I kinda like having constants declared as such since that means the

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2319: Mem: adding architectural page table support for SE mode

On Aug. 14, 2014, 9:22 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: src/arch/x86/pagetable.hh, line 169 http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2319/diff/1/?file=40442#file40442line169 I'd prefer to see this refactored so that the X86 architectural page table inherits from the multi-level page table instead.