[gem5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/tru64/o3-tim

Re: [gem5-dev] Changing clockPeriod of cpu_clk_domain in gem5 | SrcClockDomain::clockPeriod(Tick clock_period)

Hi Lokesh, There are two key components in gem5 designed to change the frequency and voltages dynamically: - First, you have the DVFSHandler which is just a form of API for doing these kinds of changes - Second, you have an EnergyCtrl instance which is a memory-mapped component, visible to the O

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2313: kvm, x86: Adding support for SE mode execution

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2313/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2014, 4:21 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

[gem5-dev] Extending x86 ISA to support full SSE and AVX

Greetings, I am interested in adding full support for SSE and AVX to GEM5. I have gone through all the documentation on the ISA DSL and looked at source code, but I believe I am missing the level of understanding to begin adding these instructions. I was wondering if there is some better

[gem5-dev] Undefined Behavior Sanitizer

Hi everyone, As you may have seen, we have posted a patch to simplify the use of gcc’s and clang’s Undefined Behaviour Sanitizer (UBSan) with gem5: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2429/ Using UBSan, we have cleaned up a number of issues that were unearthed when running the ARM regressions. It would

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2460/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 10424

[gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2461/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 10425

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2460/#review5386 --- Should this not be folded into the original patch? - Andreas Hansson O

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2461/#review5387 --- Should this not be folded into the original patch? - Andreas Hansson O

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 7:57 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Should this not be folded into the original patch? I am not sure, that patch has already been commited. I thought once commited, a patch becomes a commit and one can't modify it. - Alexandru -

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 7:57 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Should this not be folded into the original patch? > > Alexandru Dutu wrote: > I am not sure, that patch has already been commited. I thought once > commited, a patch becomes a commit and one can't modify it. My bad. - Andreas

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2460/#review5391 --- src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 12:57 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Should this not be folded into the original patch? > > Alexandru Dutu wrote: > I am not sure, that patch has already been commited. I thought once > commited, a patch becomes a commit and one can't modify it. > > Andreas Hansson w

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2461/#review5392 --- src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 1:45 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh, line 181 > > > > > > I'm not sure I'm a massive fan...but then again, I don't quite know > > what to suggest instead. I thi

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2460: mem: Multi Level Page Table bug fix

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 8:43 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh, line 151 > > > > > > Is fatal really suitable here? Is it a user error, or should it rather > > be a panic? I interpret thi

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

> On Sept. 30, 2014, 8:45 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh, line 181 > > > > > > I'm not sure I'm a massive fan...but then again, I don't quite know > > what to suggest instead. > > S

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2461/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2014, 9:25 p.m.) Review request for Default. Changes ---

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2461: mem: Page Table long lines

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2461/#review5396 --- Ship it! src/mem/multi_level_page_table_impl.hh

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2422: ruby: drop ruby's memory controller, interface with classic's.

> On Sept. 25, 2014, 7:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc, line 58 > > > > > > Should we not have one of these for every memory controller? Or am I > > missing something? >

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2422: ruby: drop ruby's memory controller, interface with classic's.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2422/ --- (Updated Sept. 30, 2014, 9:38 p.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 2422: ruby: drop ruby's memory controller, interface with classic's.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2422/#review5398 --- configs/ruby/Ruby.py