---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3235/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
Changeset 11229
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3207/#review7637
---
Thanks for updating the review. I think the overall design is good, but t
> On Nov. 20, 2015, 9:32 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Looks like a good design to me. I'm currently testing it in aarch32 and it
> > seems to work. There are a couple of nits below, but the code looks good
> > overall.
> >
> > There is one ARM-specific high-level issues that you will need
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3207/
---
(Updated Nov. 23, 2015, 9:09 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3225/
---
(Updated Nov. 23, 2015, 9:07 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Changes
---
M
On Sept. 10, 2015, 4:20 p.m., Abdul Mutaal Ahmad wrote:
> > As you already mentioned, restoring from a checkpoint probably doesn't
> > work. Looks good other than that. I'm Ok with this change if you add a
> > warning when restoring from checkpoints, but please fix checkpointing in a
> > separ
On Sept. 10, 2015, 4:20 p.m., Abdul Mutaal Ahmad wrote:
> > As you already mentioned, restoring from a checkpoint probably doesn't
> > work. Looks good other than that. I'm Ok with this change if you add a
> > warning when restoring from checkpoints, but please fix checkpointing in a
> > separ
