Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3302: sim: always generate sim/tags.cc

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3302/ --- (Updated Feb. 4, 2016, 1:35 a.m.) Review request for Default. Changes --- Ma

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3271: mem: Move the point of coherency to the coherent crossbar

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3271/#review7986 --- I would like to review this more closely, but am having trouble finding t

[gem5-dev] x86 patches to be committed

I posted most of these x86 patches two weeks ago. If I don't hear something by Friday (2/5), I'll assume that no one wants to review them, and will commit them sometime after that. http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3290/ http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3291/ http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3307/ Thanks, Steve

Re: [gem5-dev] Bug: Bug reporting site is not working

I'd also like to express my support for moving to GitHub. Our team is already using the gem5 GitHub mirror as the upstream for our internal development. Officially moving to GitHub would simplify all aspects of the development process as it relates to everything other than simply keeping in sync

Re: [gem5-dev] Follow-up: Removing QueuedSlavePort from DRAMCtrl

Hi Joel, I would suggest o keep the queued ports, but add methods to reserve resources, query if it has free space, and a way to register callbacks so that the MemObject is made aware when packets are sent. That way we can use the queue in the cache, memory controller etc, without having all th

[gem5-dev] Patches good to go

Hi all, I intend to push these patches early next week. Let me know if you have comments or need more time: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3271/ http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3294/ Thanks, Andreas IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privi

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3230: dist, dev: add an ethernet switch model

Dear Tony, Could you please commit these two patches? I will appreciate it as these patches are essential for dist-gem5 functionality. http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3231/ http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3230/ Thank you, Mohammad Alian On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Tony Gutierrez wrote: > This is a

Re: [gem5-dev] Bug: Bug reporting site is not working

Yes, it was a news flash to me that someone was trying to use flyspray. I agree that it would be nice to move to some hosted cloud service since things have come a long way in that space since we started the project :). Steve On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:12 AM Andreas Sandberg wrote: > Maybe we s

Re: [gem5-dev] Bug: Bug reporting site is not working

Maybe we should consider moving issue tracking to GitHub? It¹s already there, it works, and it would remove the need for someone to admin FlySpray. In general, I¹d like to see us moving to more hosted infrastructure to avoid having to do boring server management stuff. Just my 2p. //Andreas On 0

[gem5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/simple-atomic CHANGED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/simple-timing CHANGED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-atomic-mp CHANGED! * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/30.eio-mp/