[gem5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

* build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/o3-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/minor-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-timing: passed. * build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/se/00.hello/alpha/linux/sim

[gem5-dev] DVFS support on ARM64

Hi to all, I want to simulate an arm64 system with DVFS support. Are there any guidelines regarding the necessary updates on the aarch64 dtb file and linux kernel to support frequency scaling? Kind Regards, /Nikos ___ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3634: gpu: Added method to compute the actual workgroup size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3634/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 11653

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3624: arch: [Patch 1/5] Added RISC-V base instruction set RV64I

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3624/#review8737 --- Thanks again for getting this in shape. There are a few minor questions a

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3634: gpu: Added method to compute the actual workgroup size

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3634/#review8738 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Make sure you update the summary line, i.e.,

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3635: gdb: Adds a warning in case gdb is attached multiple times

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3635/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 11654

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3636: kvm: Adding details to kvm page fault in x86

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3636/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 11655

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3637: mem: Functional page tables data structure change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3637/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 11656

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3637: mem: Functional page tables data structure change

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3637/#review8739 --- Surely an unordered_map also only allows a single entry per key. - Andre

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3636: kvm: Adding details to kvm page fault in x86

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3636/#review8740 --- src/arch/x86/pseudo_inst.cc (line 35)

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3636: kvm: Adding details to kvm page fault in x86

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3636/ --- (Updated Sept. 27, 2016, 10:49 p.m.) Review request for Default. Repository: gem5

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3637: mem: Functional page tables data structure change

> On Sept. 27, 2016, 10:17 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Surely an unordered_map also only allows a single entry per key. Correct! This patch actually replaced typedef m5::hash_map PTable; with typedef std::map PTable; The problem was m5::hash_map was implemented as a multimap which holds m

[gem5-dev] Review Request 3638: mem: Minor dprintf fix to abstract mem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3638/ --- Review request for Default. Repository: gem5 Description --- Changeset 11671

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3638: mem: Minor dprintf fix to abstract mem

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3638/#review8742 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jason Lowe-Power On Sept. 27, 2016, 11 p.m., Tony

Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request 3624: arch: [Patch 1/5] Added RISC-V base instruction set RV64I

> On Sept. 27, 2016, 8:53 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Thanks again for getting this in shape. There are a few minor questions and > > comment on the patch, the most important one is related to the copyrights. > > > > Also, I assume you have used hg copy for the files that are more or less