---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3806/#review9427
---
Ship it!
I don't remember much about SPARC address translation, but
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3810/
---
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
Description
---
After
Hello all,
I have a review open to fix a bug for the SPARC TLB and translation code that
only affects SE Mode. The fix should solve the SE Mode regression issue where
the SPARC tests run forever. I posted it a little over a week ago and plan to
push it this coming Thursday (02/16/17) if I do
changeset 0e73ec98b6bc in /z/repo/gem5
details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=0e73ec98b6bc
description:
riscv: Remove ECALL tests from insttest
The system calls tested in rv64i.cpp in RISC-V's insttest suite have
different behavior depending on the operating
changeset 4d1f9823013a in /z/repo/gem5
details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=4d1f9823013a
description:
misc: Clean up and complete the gem5<->SystemC-TLM bridge [6/10]
The current TLM bridge only provides a Slave Port that allows the gem5
world to send
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3809/#review9426
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jason Lowe-Power
On Feb. 12, 2017, 4:36 a.m.,
Hi Boris,
Have you had any luck with this? I’ve taken another look at the loader debug
output and the exec trace, and I’m stumped. The data from the loader appears
correct as far as addresses and sizes of segments go, and as I said the address
gem5 tries to load from when it crashes contains
> On Jan. 25, 2017, 11:28 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
> What was the verdict? Is it just a matter of an updated patch
> description/summary and then this should be pushed?
>
> Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> Yes, the description needs to be updated.
> On Jan. 25, 2017, 11:28 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
> What was the verdict? Is it just a matter of an updated patch
> description/summary and then this should be pushed?
>
> Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> Yes, the description needs to be updated.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/3781/
---
(Updated Feb. 13, 2017, 3 p.m.)
Review request for Default.
Repository: gem5
> On Jan. 25, 2017, 11:28 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
> What was the verdict? Is it just a matter of an updated patch
> description/summary and then this should be pushed?
Yes, the description needs to be updated. I'm not sure what happened to the
11 matches
Mail list logo