. Why not just use those rather than
add a new interconnect subdir?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Nilay
Vaish via gem5-dev
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:37 PM
To: Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Memory
:01 AM
To: Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Memory directory structure
Brad, would not a couple of sed commands be enough for fixing paths in existing
patches? I think we should let Andreas move slicc and protocol directory to
ruby and he would provide a sed script that fixes
Hi all,
I was contemplating adding a src/mem/ram subdirectory and put the DRAM and
SimpleMemory files there.
I would also like to propose to move src/mem/protocol and src/mem/slicc into
the src/mem/ruby subdirectory as they are unique to Ruby. Does that make sense?
It might be worth creating
It might be worth thinking about the mem directory name in general as
well. A couple of the things in there are actually memory, but the
directory seems to be for a more general class of stuff. For instance,
interconnect isn't a type of memory, and it doesn't necessarily connected
to memory
I am fine with the proposed changes.
--
Nilay
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev wrote:
Hi all,
I was contemplating adding a src/mem/ram subdirectory and put the DRAM and
SimpleMemory files there.
I would also like to propose to move src/mem/protocol and src/mem/slicc into
] On Behalf Of Nilay Vaish via
gem5-dev
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:37 PM
To: Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Memory directory structure
I am fine with the proposed changes.
--
Nilay
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev wrote:
Hi all,
I
interconnect subdir?
Brad
-Original Message-
From: gem5-dev [mailto:gem5-dev-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Nilay
Vaish via gem5-dev
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:37 PM
To: Andreas Hansson via gem5-dev
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Memory directory structure
I am fine with the proposed changes
