That's an excellent idea and yes, that seems like a good course of
action.
Ali
On 23.01.2013 14:04, nathan binkert wrote:
> With the
new system, for this case, dumping a subset of stats would
> not be all
that difficult. If you're dumping that frequently, it
> doesn't seem to
be a huge bur
With the new system, for this case, dumping a subset of stats would
not be all that difficult. If you're dumping that frequently, it
doesn't seem to be a huge burden to expect people to narrow down the
subset of stats that they're interested in if they want speed.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:59 AM
Yes. Pretty much the question in my mind is how many people are
dumping stats at a rate greater than once every 100k instructions?
Thanks,
Ali
On 23.01.2013 11:53, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> Right,
I'd say the main concern here is for people whose usage model
>
incorporates fairly frequent
Right, I'd say the main concern here is for people whose usage model
incorporates fairly frequent periodic stats dumps (who are probably more
likely to want the SQL output anyway).
Steve
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:27 AM, nathan binkert wrote:
> It's worth making the point that this is only when
It's worth making the point that this is only when dumping the stats.
Stats collection hasn't changed. If performance of the dump is really
a concern, I'm sure I can offer some suggestions to improve things.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Andreas Hansson
wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I occurs when on
Hi Steve,
I occurs when only using the SQL output, i.e. old text only replaced with
new SQL only. Adding text output to the latter unfortunately slows things
down even more due to the additional formatting/formula evaluation etc.
In a typical use-case the text formatting could be done after the
s
Hi Andreas,
Sorry I have not had time to look at your patches, but I fully support what
you're doing in principle.
One clarification about the slowdown: does this occur even when you use
text output, or does it occur only when you use SQL? That is, will users
who stick with text output be affect
Hi all,
The short version:
A week ago I posted a number of review requests that build on top of Nate's
initial work to move the stats from C++ to Python. The reviews, request 1636 to
1647, has not gotten any comments so far, and I would like to know if people
are generally happy with these pat
