Re: [gem5-dev] PyBind11 as a SWIG replacement

Hi Everyone, All of the patches that add PyBind support have received reviews from Jason (thanks!), so they are technically ready to be submitted. However, since this is a large change, I would like to give everyone a chance to test it or add reviews before I submit it. I plan to let the change

Re: [gem5-dev] PyBind11 as a SWIG replacement

Hi Andreas, I think it's OK for us to ignore the warnings. It isn't like SWIG didn't dump out 1000s of warnings before. I'll take a close look at the patch next Wed. or Thurs. Sorry for the delay. Jason On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:08 AM Andreas Sandberg wrote: > Hi

[gem5-dev] PyBind11 as a SWIG replacement

Hi Everyone, Some time ago, I posted a series of changes [1] to switch from SWIG to PyBind for our Python wrappers. I'd like to know what people think about this move at a high level. Do we want to make this change? These are the main benefits I have identified: * PyBind11 can be