Hi all,
Generally, I think that any code that doesn't have tests and we are not
actively supporting should be removed. We can always resurrect it with
about the same amount of work as getting it up to date today. Plus, we can
now say "the code is available in gem5-20."
We have an extremely lean d
I assume this is leftover from Ali's thesis, which sadly did not take the
world by storm as it deserved to. So I expect he'd be OK with us getting
rid of it, as would I.
Steve
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jason Lowe-Power
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Generally, I think that any code that doesn't ha
Since everybody is in agreement so far, I'll probably put together a CL in
the next day or two to remove this code. I'll add everybody to the review
and wait a little bit just to make sure there aren't any last minute
objections.
Gabe
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:05 AM Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> I
https://gem5-review.googlesource.com/c/public/gem5/+/32954
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:57 PM Gabe Black wrote:
> Since everybody is in agreement so far, I'll probably put together a CL in
> the next day or two to remove this code. I'll add everybody to the review
> and wait a little bit just to ma
