[m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression quick

2010-03-07 Thread Cron Daemon
* build/ALPHA_FS/tests/fast/quick/10.linux-boot/alpha/linux/tsunami-simple-timing-dual passed. * build/ALPHA_FS/tests/fast/quick/80.netperf-stream/alpha/linux/twosys-tsunami-simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA_FS/tests/fast/quick/10.linux-boot/alpha/linux/tsunami-simple-timing pas

Re: [m5-dev] tests

2010-03-07 Thread Gabe Black
> (Practically speaking, do we > support anything other than linux on any other ISA?) > Only supporting Linux doesn't mean the OS never changes. It would be nice to be able to test both 32 and 64 bits of Linux in both FS and SE, or even different configurations of each. This is especially true

Re: [m5-dev] tests

2010-03-07 Thread Steve Reinhardt
This looks like a good start... I agree with you and Brad both that explicitly enumerating the tests and making sure we can add tests via EXTRAS are key features. My inclination is to push it a little farther in terms of abstraction though... all we really need for a test is a command to run and a

Re: [m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

2010-03-07 Thread Steve Reinhardt
Yea, I'd been thinking too that it would be nice to have an easier way of seeing if any tests failed. The two failures this time are both print the error message "panic: Tried to read from invalid ipr N" where N is 296 for twolf and 307 for vortex. Thanks for the reminder about your test email, N

Re: [m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

2010-03-07 Thread nathan binkert
It's in the plans. Steve, any opinions on my last email about tests? On Sunday, March 7, 2010, Korey Sewell wrote: > The pass/fail groupings are probably a good idea. > > Not sure why those inorder tests are failing, but I should be able to take a > look tomorrow. I haven't been paying too clos

Re: [m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

2010-03-07 Thread Korey Sewell
The pass/fail groupings are probably a good idea. Not sure why those inorder tests are failing, but I should be able to take a look tomorrow. I haven't been paying too close of attention to the changesets so I'm not sure off-hand what could be the culprit. On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Gabe Bla

Re: [m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

2010-03-07 Thread Gabe Black
Cron Daemon wrote: > * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/long/70.twolf/alpha/tru64/inorder-timing > FAILED! > * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/long/50.vortex/alpha/tru64/inorder-timing > FAILED! > I don't know if anybody noticed these. There were a couple last week too, apparently. Since we have s

[m5-dev] Cron /z/m5/regression/do-regression --scratch all

2010-03-07 Thread Cron Daemon
* build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/tru64/simple-timing-ruby passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/01.hello-2T-smt/alpha/linux/o3-timing passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello/alpha/linux/simple-atomic passed. * build/ALPHA_SE/tests/fast/quick/00.hello