> 7) Made various bug fixes and alterations to correct corner cases I found
> when implementing this stuff.
>
> I'm not so sure about 1) and it would be good to get Kevin's input on that.
> I hope to extend it to make one generic branch predictor so that the
> in-order core can make use of it too,
Hi everyone,
I've just posted to the review board 12 patches that enable me to
perform SMARTS-like sampling simulation. Most are finished and I'd be
happy to commit them if everyone is ok with them. A couple are not
quite there yet and I'd like input on whether they are correct and
whether
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/57/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Sim: Add functionality to the simulatio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/56/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Stats: Allow backing up and restoring o
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/55/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Port: Only indicate that a SimpleTiming
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/54/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
O3CPU: Fix a bug where stores in the cp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/53/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Cache: Provide a function to mark cache
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/52/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Syscall: Don't close the simulator's st
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/51/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
CPU: Add functions to get the number of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/50/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
O3CPU: O3's tick event gets squashed wh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/49/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Sim: When one CPU is taking over from a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/48/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
SimpleCPU: Allow Simple CPUs to warm a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/47/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
BranchPred: Take the branch predictor o
Hi Eberle,
Yes I compiled with the –static flag.
gcc -ggdb3 -O3 -D__DEBUG -c ../pthread.c -o ../pthread.o
g++ -g -O3 –D__DEBUG -c -o test_pthreadbasic.o test_pthreadbasic.cpp
g++ -static -o test_pthreadbasic test_pthreadbasic.o ../pthread.o
is what the Makefile in m5threads/test does by defaul
Hi Tushar,
yes, something like that happened to me. You compiled (linked) with the
-static flag, right?
--
Eberle A. Rambo.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Krishna, Tushar wrote:
> Thanks Eberle.
>
> I did a make on the tests within m5threads using my system's regular
> gcc/g++ (for x86), and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/35/
---
Review request for Default.
Summary
---
Power: Provide a utility function to co
Thanks Eberle.
I did a make on the tests within m5threads using my system's regular gcc/g++
(for x86), and tried running one of the binaries through M5 in X86_SE mode like
this:
./build/X86_SE/m5.debug configs/example/se.py
--cmd=m5threads/tests/test_pthreadsbasic
I get the following error:
Gl
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Min Kyu Jeong wrote:
> The following is the excerpt from the disassembly.
>
> 117c: e321f013 msr CPSR_c, #19 ; 0x13
> 1180: e24fd08c sub sp, pc, #140 ; 0x8c
> 1184: e321f011 msr CPSR_c, #17 ; 0x11
> 1188: e24fd094 sub sp, pc, #148 ; 0x94
> 118c:
The following is the excerpt from the disassembly.
117c: e321f013 msr CPSR_c, #19 ; 0x13
1180: e24fd08c sub sp, pc, #140 ; 0x8c
1184: e321f011 msr CPSR_c, #17 ; 0x11
1188: e24fd094 sub sp, pc, #148 ; 0x94
118c: e321f012 msr CPSR_c, #18 ; 0x12
1190: e24fd09c sub sp, pc, #156
Thanks for the extra info which should be very helpful. Can you please
tell us what the actual bytes are for the junk instruction?
Gabe
Quoting Min Kyu Jeong :
I looked into this thing, but still don't fully understand how the
out-of-bound reg index causes segfault. Instead, I will just desc
I looked into this thing, but still don't fully understand how the
out-of-bound reg index causes segfault. Instead, I will just describe what
is happening hoping someone would catch a clue from it.
The register index that goes out of bound is the architectural register
index, stored in StaticInst
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me how to retrieve my password for the review board? I've
just accidentally logged out and can't find any sort of 'Forgotten
password' link or anything of that kind. My user name is tmjones, if that
helps.
Cheers
Tim
--
Timothy M. Jones
http://homepages.inf.ed.
22 matches
Mail list logo