Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
riday, February 25, 2011 12:20 PM To: m5-dev@m5sim.org Subject: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby Brad, Here is my understanding of the current state of functional accesses in gem5. As of now, all functional accesses are forwarded to the PhysicalMemory's MemoryPort. Instead, we wou

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
erturb the system. Brad -Original Message- From: m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org [mailto:m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org] On Behalf Of Nilay Vaish Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 9:06 AM To: M5 Developer List Subject: Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby I was thinking about the behavi

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Beckmann, Brad
y Vaish > Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 9:06 AM > To: M5 Developer List > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby > > I was thinking about the behavior of functional accesses. Currently in > gdb > we can change the value of a program variable. Does t

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-26 Thread Nilay Vaish
: Friday, February 25, 2011 12:20 PM To: m5-dev@m5sim.org Subject: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby Brad, Here is my understanding of the current state of functional accesses in gem5. As of now, all functional accesses are forwarded to the PhysicalMemory's MemoryPort. Instead, we would

Re: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-25 Thread Beckmann, Brad
PM > To: m5-dev@m5sim.org > Subject: [m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby > > Brad, > > Here is my understanding of the current state of functional accesses in gem5. > As of now, all functional accesses are forwarded to the PhysicalMemory's > MemoryPort. Inste

[m5-dev] Functional Access support in Ruby

2011-02-25 Thread Nilay Vaish
Brad, Here is my understanding of the current state of functional accesses in gem5. As of now, all functional accesses are forwarded to the PhysicalMemory's MemoryPort. Instead, we would like to add recvFunctional() function to M5Port of the RubyPort, and attach this port as peer instead of t