Re: [m5-dev] Ruby Atomics

2009-07-07 Thread Steve Reinhardt
What we really need for x86 is more general locking. We've added a LOCKED flag to the mem request, and the current x86 microcode uses this for locked operations, where the semantics are that a load with the LOCKED flag (which should "lock" the cache block) is always followed by a store with the LO

[m5-dev] Ruby Atomics

2009-07-07 Thread Derek Hower
We (Wisconsin) are working on implementing atomics in Ruby. For LL/SC, we are going to stick with the implementation from the original GEM5 that closely mimics how LL/SC is/was handled in the M5 cache. For single instructions atomics (fetch&add, comp&swap, etc), we are thinking about an implement