Hi Jason & Nathanael,
Thank you for both of your informative replies. These have been really helpful.
Leon
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(
Hi Jason,
Thank you for such elaborate explanation. I will look into it.
Another weird thing happened today. I noticed that while running a benchmark,
TLB seemed to have never triggered a miss condition. I came to this conclusion
because TLB always started and ended at the same tick according t
Hi All:
As I know, Atomic or Timing CPU’s IPC is 1 IPC, but when I test a
program in SE mode with –debug-flags=Exec, in the debug output file, I find
that one instruction’s tick is incremented by 1000, my cpu frequency is 2 GHz.
Does that mean that the IPC is 0.5(cycle=1000/500)?
Is
Hello,
Although not modelled, they do have an impact on performance for the O3 model.
Upon a TLB miss, the access is considered as faulty, triggering a pipeline
flush and a re-execution.
At that point, the SE page table has been populated and the access gets its
translation.
Also, I assume that
