Hi Aritra,
There is a parameter for parsec benchmark to choose how many threads to run
program. It should be `-n thread_num`, here are some parsec examples:
https://github.com/bamos/parsec-benchmark#more-examples.
For gem5, this parameter can be changed in
`configs/example/gem5_library/x86-
Hi Aritra,
I am not entirely certain about the specifics of what you want to do but my
assumption is that you intend to execute PARSEC with multiple threads in
gem5. The process should align with how you would run PARSEC on a physical
hardware machine.
Regards,
Harshil Patel.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023
Hi Gunjan,
I am not an expert at this. I found some stats that represent cache miss
latency and might be helpful:
overallMisses::processor.cores.core.inst, overallMisses::total,
demandMissLatency::processor.cores.core.inst,
demandMissLatency::total,
overallMissLatency::processor.cores.core.inst,
ov
I need to clean a victim block from the cache instead of evicting it from the
last level of the cache (LLC). my objective is to write the block to the main
memory without removing it from the LLC.
To achieve this, I have identified the writecleanBlk() function within the base
cache class as a s
Hi,
Can anyone share the methodology for running multi-threaded programmes in
Gem5 FS mode with the Ruby memory model? To be specific, I am interested in
the PARSEC benchmark suite. I have the following doubt:
Let 'A' be a programme from the PARSEC suite. Let there be 8 cores in the
simulated Gem
Getting this error is normally a side-effect of not having enough RAM. We 12GB
or more to compile gem5 safely.
___
gem5-users mailing list -- gem5-users@gem5.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gem5-users-le...@gem5.org
It can be resolved by installing the libraries that are missing. How you do so
will different depending on your host system. However, these are just warnings,
not errors. gem5 is still usable for the vast majority of cases without these
libraries. These warnings simply exist to inform the users
I think this is an annoying comment to here, but it means there’s an an
instruction it doesn’t know how to process. In SE mode the error handling is
very unhelpful in telling you what that instruction actually is. I’m almost
certain in this case your compilation is including some ISA extension w
Hi,
Did you call m5.instantiate before calling m5.simulate? (I don’t see it from
the code snippet you posted)
Kind Regards
Giacomo
From: Tran, Huy Dinh via gem5-users
Date: Thursday, 2 November 2023 at 20:33
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Cc: Tran, Huy Dinh
Subject: [gem5-users] m5.switchCpus for A
I don’t believe it’s possible to run multiple processes in SE mode. What you
can do is have a single muli-threader process. You could construct a single
binary which utilizes pthreads and have each thread it run something different,
though this could prove difficult to do.
__
What i dont understand here is why do you need cpu switching for starter_fs.py.
Couldn't you juse use starter_fs.py to get the checkpoints you need then load
these checkopoints into a simulation which uses the stdlib?
\
They'll be no easy way of introducing stdlib code like
SimpleSwitchableProc
11 matches
Mail list logo