Dear Choi,
there seems to be a problem with your results. If you see the Runtime
Dynamic results, it mentions that they are either inf or nan. This means
that in the xml file that was produced from the python script, the runtime
statistics have not been written properly.
As such McPAT does not com
Hi Ayush,
if you want you may check my version of McPAT (based on v1.3 with some
improvements) and the conversion tool that I include. I have not checked if
the latest version of gem5 made any changes to the outputs that it
produces, otherwise it should be fine.
This is the repository: https://git
Hi, maybe you can check this work: https://github.com/ntampouratzis/ACSIM .
I believe that you may contact the author directly as I know it is still
being developed (although not publicly available at the moment).
Best regards,
Andreas
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:45 AM hgedek--- via gem5-users <
g
Hi,
peak power refers to the peak dynamic + total leakage. Peak dynamic is
kinda like a TDP value, meaning that it is what a fully active circuit
would give you (let's call the scenario a power virus, not an actual
working code). When you execute a specific code on your simulator and use
the diffe
Hi Dan,
in this repository: https://github.com/kingmouf/cmcpat I have added a
modified version of McPAT (it details the changes) as well as necessary
templates and scripts to work with the November 2019 version of gem5. I
have not been able to track if the newest version of gem5 breaks any of the
Hi Javed,
the site is https://www.gem5.org/
Best,
Andreas
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:48 PM Javed Osmany
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> When I try to access http://new.gem5.org, I am getting
>
>
>
> *The Host is not resolvable,please make sure the URL is correct.*
>
>
>
> Is the above the correct URL for a
Hi Jason,
I think master should be stable.
I think gem5 should be released once per year.
Best,
Andreas
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:30 AM Muhammet Abdullah Soytürk <
muhammetabdullahsoyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> For the first one, I think master should be stable.
>
> For the second o
e don't do
>>>> that too. The headers are set up in such a way that that include *should*
>>>> be isolated though, unless you've included one of the top level systemc
>>>> includes like or . That way gem5 itself doesn't require
>>>>
Hi all,
I am trying to compile gem5 cloned from the official repository on Ubuntu
19.10 with gcc 9.2.1 installed. I keep on getting errors that make
practically the compilation process impossible.
The first errors were about implicitly-declared things all over the code. I
managed to workaround th
2019, 10:28 PM Andreas Brokalakis wrote:
>
>> All right, so you need to properly adjust the xml template that you are
>> using. Have you edited the template.xml file to match your gem5
>> configuration?
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019, 18:31 karunya ganesh,
>> wro
h mesh topology sir.
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 9:34 PM Andreas Brokalakis
>> Hi,
>> first of all does the template xml match the processor that you are
>> trying to simulate in GEM5? Can you please tell me which version of GEM5
>> you are using? Also what type of simul
: system.mem_ctrls16.avgGap is nan. Setting it to 0
> Warning (stats): system.mem_ctrls16.pageHitRate is nan. Setting it to 0
> Reading config from: config.json
> Reading McPAT template from: template.xml
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "GEM5ToMcPAT.py",
Try this one: https://github.com/H2020-COSSIM/cMcPAT . Not really sure if
an update in gem5 has broken anything (if it has please report it back to
me)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 7:43 AM nevethetha ganesan
wrote:
> Hello,
> I need to take the power statistics in gem5. Please help if anyone has
> McP
stems
>
>
> On 17 Oct 2018, at 00:16, Weizheng Xu
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have add the template I used for McPAT as the attachment. But I still
> have the same problem here. I have check the repository of the person who
> help me before https://github.com/H20
not sure how can I change the template
> because when I change the value of number of cores and others, they have
> the same problem.
>
> Any help appreciate.
>
> Best wishes,
> weizheng
>
>
>
>
> 在 Sep 25, 2018,7:10 AM,Andreas Brokalakis 写道:
>
> Dear Wei
Dear Weizheng,
you are using a quite old version of McPAT. Current version is 1.3. It
would be better if you used that one.
Now concerning your issues. You need to make sure that the system that you
are trying to simulate in gem5 matches with the template that you are
trying to use in McPAT. It i
Hi Yi Shen,
there are a few things to consider here. First, gem5 and McPAT work on
different levels. gem5 does not include and circuit information nor
anything else beyond architectural stuff. On the other hand McPAT requires
information that gem5 is simply not in a position to provide. That is wh
Hi Boyang,
you can download the linux kernel images that we have built for our gem5 (
https://github.com/H2020-COSSIM) that have the following : a Gentoo Base
system for x86_64 and BusyBox for ARM processors (there are also other
kernels included). For these two images, we have installed Java JRE7
Hi George,
in order to make this work you need to start with a proper template that
can handle the bigLITTLE architecture. Then from stats.txt you will get the
proper numerical values that are associated with you simulation (i.e.
utilization factors) and from the gem5 config json file you'll get s
Hi Jeckson,
if you check the presentations from the latest gem5 workshop, in our group
we have most probably already implemented what you are looking to do.
Please check here:
http://gem5.org/wiki/images/5/52/Summit2017_complex_fs_incorporating_accelerators.pdf
If you think that this works for wh
iruk
> UST student
> ETRI
> Daejeon Korea
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:28 PM, Andreas Brokalakis
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> at the recent gem5 workshop (ARM Research Summit), we presented COSSIM
>> Simulation Framework ( http://gem5.org/ARM_Re
, it provides me
>> the below errors-
>>
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "./GEM5ToMcPAT.py", line 181, in
>> main()
>> File "./GEM5ToMcPAT.py", line 53, in main
>> dumpMcpatOut(opts.out)
>> File "
If a networked (dual or more nodes) system is to be simulated, COSSIM that
extends gem5, does support heterogeneous system simulation out of the box.
You may want to try it out: https://github.com/H2020-COSSIM
Best,
Andreas
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 6:03 PM, Mohammad Alian
wrote:
> I don't think i
Hi Boyang,
can you be a little bit more specific? Is the x86 and ARM node
interconnected somehow or they are separate and you want to compare the
results? Do they run the same application? Is it something like a
client-server application?
Best,
Andreas
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:41 PM, Boyang Xu
quickly evaluate the framework, we have also made available a Virtual
Machine based on Ubuntu 14.04 that has everything up and running.
We thank you in advance and wait for your feedback and comments!
Best regards,
Andreas Brokalakis
___
gem5-users mailing
Yes, the simulation of a single system (be it single or multi-core) is
carried out on a single thread.
Best,
Andreas
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:39 PM, Timon Evenblij
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been reading into using multiple threads for a system simulation,
> but so far, the only existing opti
Dear all,
here: https://github.com/H2020-COSSIM/cMcPAT you can find a slightly
modified version of McPAT along with conversion scripts to connect GEM5 and
McPAT.
The differences between McPAT v1.3 and cMcPAT are documented. The
conversion scripts are based on the source code that you mention, ho
me details related about it.
> this may shorten my accomplishment date to join my families.
> This is my 5th year out of family.
> thank you in advance.
> Biruk
> UST student
> ETRI
> Daejeon Korea
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Andreas Brokalakis
> wrote:
>
&g
Hi Biruk,
my group is developing a version of gem5 that most probably has all what
you want and more. We havent submitted it yet to the official repository,
but maybe we can work this out.
Our approach uses normal gem5 and integrates it with OMNET++ through HLA.
The end result is an integrated pa
Hi,
shouldn't it be the other way around? Try to integrate it better with GEM5?
If McPAT is not ideal, then maybe some other power/energy estimator in its
place?
Best regards,
Andreas
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andreas Hansson
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would suggest we remove McPat as it i
30 matches
Mail list logo