[gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-22 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
dc in AtomicSimpleCPU::tick > (this=0x59649600) at build/ARM/cpu/simple/atomic.cc:685 > #20 0x5715ffcd in std::function::operator()() const > (this=0x596499a0) at /usr/include/c++/7/bits/std_function.h:706 > #21 EventFunctionWrapper::process (this=0x59649968) at >

[gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-22 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
tq.cc:223 #23 0x57181cd0 in doSimLoop (eventq=0x5900b200) at build/ARM/sim/simulate.cc:216 #24 0x57182eda in simulate (num_cycles=) at build/ARM/sim/simulate.cc:129 ``` -jrb From: Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> Sent: Friday, January 22, 202

[gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-22 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
/ARM/sim/eventq.cc:223 #23 0x57181cd0 in doSimLoop (eventq=0x5900b200) at build/ARM/sim/simulate.cc:216 #24 0x57182eda in simulate (num_cycles=) at build/ARM/sim/simulate.cc:129 ``` -jrb From: Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 10:07 AM T

[gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-22 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
l Message- > From: Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users > Sent: 22 January 2021 12:51 > To: gem5 users mailing list > Cc: Gabe Black ; Bohren, Jonathan > > Subject: [gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs > > Gabe, > > > > Yeah, this is a very recent

[gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-22 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
: [gem5-users] Re: VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs Are you using up to date develop? There was a bug like this a while ago, but it's been fixed on develop for a while as well. Gabe On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 6:35 PM Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org>> wrote: We'v

[gem5-users] VExpress_GEM5_V1, Ethernet, and BARs

2021-01-21 Thread Bohren, Jonathan via gem5-users
We've been using the `VExpress_GEM5_V1` platform but it was failing on both `stable` and `develop` when adding an `IGbE_e1000` PCI device to the `makeArmSystem()` function in `FSConfig.py`. We've worked around it, but looking for the "right way" to add such a device. For reference, the change