Re: [gem5-users] Memory replies to L1

2012-02-07 Thread Mahmood Naderan
You are right. Many ticks after that the blk (0xbc000) is returned to L1D. In another topic, I asked about exclusive and inclusive implementation. Seems that the default code is inclusive. Thanks On 2/6/12, Nilay Vaish wrote: > It seems from your response that the L1 cache never receives any dat

Re: [gem5-users] Memory replies to L1

2012-02-06 Thread Nilay Vaish
It seems from your response that the L1 cache never receives any data. If that's what you meant, I think you should read the code again. Secondly, it is not necessary for the memory to directly reply to L1 cache, the L2 cache can respond to L1's request once it has got the response from the mem

Re: [gem5-users] Memory replies to L1

2012-02-06 Thread Mahmood Naderan
I haven't found such algorithm in the code. Rather than that, I think in the current code, the reply is made only to the last request. For example, if L1D misses and then L2 misses, then memory reply only to L2. On 2/6/12, Nilay Vaish wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [gem5-users] Memory replies to L1

2012-02-06 Thread Nilay Vaish
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Mahmood Naderan wrote: Hi while debugging, I observed this: 1- a HardPf address is issued (0xbc000) in dcache 2- it is checked in L2 3- L2 misses 4- The block is inserted in L2. So I want to know, why it doesn't go back to dcache? 1254053000: system.cpu.dcache-pf: Requestin

[gem5-users] Memory replies to L1

2012-02-05 Thread Mahmood Naderan
Hi while debugging, I observed this: 1- a HardPf address is issued (0xbc000) in dcache 2- it is checked in L2 3- L2 misses 4- The block is inserted in L2. So I want to know, why it doesn't go back to dcache? 1254053000: system.cpu.dcache-pf: Requesting a hw_pf to issue 1254053000: system.cpu.dcac