Please update draft-ietf-mpls-oam-requirements-06.txt
with this document. Please update the MPLS web page as well.
This draft is being published to make updates based on
IESG GEN-ART change requests, which have been reviewed
and approved.
Network Working Group Tho
Ahh, missed that one. Just corrected
and sent the revision to the I-D editor after
running it through ID-nits.
Ball is in your court IESG.
--Tom
Tom,
These changes are fine, and address everything except
changing the title of Section 4.11.2 .
Thanks,
--David
---
(If you don't know about the General Area Review Team, please ask.
The FAQ isn't done yet.)
This draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard. Ship it.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Tom,
These changes are fine, and address everything except
changing the title of Section 4.11.2 .
Thanks,
--David
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748
+1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (50
This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
The -04 version of this draft was GenART reviewed for IETF Last Call.
That review is forwarded below. With the exception of splitting of
figures across pages (which the RFC Editor can readily deal with),
the concerns raised by that re
Here's the final assignments for Dec 1st based on the agenda as of this
morning:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/reviewers-051201-revised.html
Note, that 3 drafts have been removed from the agenda - the
geopriv-dhcp-civil, the eastlake-mime and enum-voice. I've just moved
them out to the n
--On mandag, november 28, 2005 10:49:35 -0500 "Bernie Volz (volz)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For DHCPv4, all three forms could be used (once
draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-05.txt is an RFC and implementations
support it).
However, the DHCPv4 server knows which format to use as it is using th
Harald:
> The problem is simple: The document gives three ways in which a DHCID
RR
> can be created based on data from a client request. Section 3.4 does
not
> specify which of the three to choose.
I don't believe this is a problem. For DHCPv6, there is only the DUID
that can be used. So, ther
Documents: draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-10.txt
draft-ietf-dnsext-dhcid-rr-10.txt
Reviewer: Harald Alvestrand
Date: Nov 28, 2005
Summary: Not ready. Technical issues.
The DDNS resolution document seems to be technically competent, and give a
reasonable procedure for detecting conflict
NOTE: The total review request was for four documents. I am breaking it up
into two reviews: One for the two DHCP options and one for the conflict
resolution procedure.
Document: draft-ietf-dhc-fqdn-option-11.txt
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-fqdn-03.txt
Reviewer: Harald Alvestrand
Date: Nov 2
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 07:09:24AM -0600, Spencer Dawkins allegedly wrote:
> p.s. JohnL used the most current FAQ text available, but it still had a
> couple of needed changes reflecting Scott Brim's note to the list. I've
> made the edits reflecting Scott's comments, and note that Brian still needs
I noticed (and I may not have been the only one) about a month ago that we
Gen-ART reviewers are starting to assume that Gen-ART is fairly widely
understood (to the point of saying things like "everybody knows about
Gen-ART, right?"), but Gen-ART has never been presented to the IETF
community a
Elwyn Davies wrote:
Background for those on the CC list, who may be unaware of GenART:
GenART is the Area Review Team for the General Area of the IETF. We
advise the General Area Director (i.e. the IETF/IESG chair) by providing
more in depth reviews than he could do himself of documents tha
Hi all,
My IETF LC review of RTP Payload Format for Uncompressed Video:
Additional Colour Sampling Modes
(draft-ietf-avt-uncomp-video-ext-01.txt). This is a short, simple draft
- its ready to go, IMO. One small comment is that the Abstract is one
sentence - I'd suggest to expand what "additional
Hi all,
Here is my GENART review of Definitions of Managed Objects for FCIP.
See footer for info about Gen-ART if you are confused.
This document is basically ready, except for 2 nits. Note that I am not
a FC nor a MIB expert, so I am assuming the MIB doctors did their job &
the WG did their job
15 matches
Mail list logo
