I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft, currently on an IESG
telechat agenda.
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Comments: the two "Spencer/Problem:" items from my 04 review have been
fixed. I don't think any of the other items from that review hav
Scott,
That sounds fine - my recommendation is not to disallow the
implementations that did TLS 1.0 according to 3734, but rather
require new implementations that follow 3734bis to support
TLS 1.1 in addition to TLS 1.0 (and prefer TLS 1.1 when there's
a choice). This is definitely a topic on wh
On 11/25/2006 12:01 PM, Hesham Soliman allegedly wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Are you referring to comments other than the "SHOULD" issue? I responded to
> all of your comments in my first email. If there is anything unclear please
> let us know.
>
> Hesham
OK. I'll take it offline for the moment.
Thanks, Brian. That's the sort of thing I was hoping to see. If the
principles ever have time I am still curious about the technical
questions in the review (which the SHOULD brouhaha buried).
swb
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1
