[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-cain-post-inch-phishingextns-04

2008-05-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-cain-p

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mpls-05.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docume

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-syslog-tc-mib-08.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Docum

[Gen-art] Assignments for 05 June 2008

2008-05-29 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the summary of assignments for the June 5th, 2008 telechat: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/reviewers-080605.html With the updated spreadsheets: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html For

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 29 May 2008

2008-05-29 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/reviewers-080529-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art.html http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-by-reviewer.html

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-kato-camellia-ctrccm-01.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I understand. But it does mean that any standards track documents that refer to this in future as a Normative Reference will need some extra administration to allow the downref. This was not such a strong rule in 2004. Brian On 2008-05-30 11:23, KATO Akihiro wrote: > Brian, > > When we made

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-rserpool-asap-19.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Michael Tüxen
Hi Spencer, see my comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 17, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.ht

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-kato-camellia-ctrccm-01.txt

2008-05-29 Thread KATO Akihiro
Brian, When we made RFC 3713, we had a following comment from Security AD (Steven Bellovin) at that time, 'IETF is not standard body for cryptography. It is appropriate that description of cryptographic algorithm will be Informational RFC , but there is no problem that application for IETF stand

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Michael Tuexen
Hi Suresh, comments in-line. Best regards Michael On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:53 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > draft-ietf-rserpool-common-param-16.txt > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

[Gen-art] Christian's Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-consent-format-06.txt

2008-05-29 Thread Gonzalo Camarillo
Hi Christian, thanks for your review. I am going to submit a new revision of the draft addressing Tim Polk's discuss. At the same time, I will address your Gen-ART review. See my answers inline: > Comments: > > (1) It would be nice if section 3.1 would briefly explain what a > condition