Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Gonzalo Camarillo
Hi, All I see after the Abstract is a section with RFC 2119 language. yes, that is the section the comment referred to. > ... the RFC Editor will always position this where he thinks it appropriate in an RFC and this has nothing to do with whether the document is ready for publication. t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Ross Callon
It seems pretty clear that the comment actually refers to the "Conventions used in this document" section. Ross -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: 27 January 2009 17:55 To: Ross Callon; Gonzalo Camarillo Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; ccamp-cha...@tools.iet

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 27 Jan 2009

2009-01-27 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for this week: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-090129-lc.html I'm sending them early this week because I'll be traveling tomorrow and jetlagged on Thursday (and there are already a lot queued up). I've also uploaded all t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Adrian Farrel
Sure. Whatever. Actually I am completely baffled by this comment as the terminology section in this I-D is Section 2. We are talking about the same I-D aren't we? draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt All I see after the Abstract is a section with RFC 2119 language. Maybe this should be ton

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mipshop-mstp-solution-11

2009-01-27 Thread Black_David
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Documen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Gonzalo Camarillo
I am fine with that. Cheers, Gonzalo Ross Callon wrote: I proposed to the authors to put in an RFC editor's note to cover your comment. If all are fine with this, then we should be ready to put this on an IESG telechat. Thanks, Ross -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Ross Callon
I proposed to the authors to put in an RFC editor's note to cover your comment. If all are fine with this, then we should be ready to put this on an IESG telechat. Thanks, Ross -Original Message- From: Gonzalo Camarillo [mailto:gonzalo.camari...@ericsson.com] Sent: 27 January 2009 04:31

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-rpf-vector-08

2009-01-27 Thread Ben Campbell
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document:

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-and-sc-reqs-06.txt

2009-01-27 Thread Gonzalo Camarillo
Hi, I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Draft: draft-ietf-c