Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-11 Thread Scott Brim
Excerpts from Ralph Droms on Fri, Apr 10, 2009 03:25:49PM -0400: Scott raises an interesting point about identifying the source of options when delivered to clients. BTW, Scott - what is DHS? Sorry, DHCP server The usual case - almost the only case today - is that there is a single

Re: [Gen-art] Retry: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

2009-04-11 Thread Randall Stewart
Brian: Yes, I have asked Anantha (primary editor now) to change my contact address. Unfortunately he has not done so yet. R On Apr 10, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: And: Randy's address is wrong in the I-D, hence mail to the generic address doesn't reach him.

Re: [Gen-art] Retry: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-11.txt

2009-04-11 Thread Randall Stewart
I am cool with that... Anantha can you get Mitesh to respond to this too? R On Apr 10, 2009, at 11:31 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2009-04-11 12:57, Anantha Ramaiah (ananth) wrote: Thanks for the responses. ... - when you mention disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 I am assuming this comes

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-11 Thread Ralph Droms
Scott - even knowing which interface which DHCP information came from may not be enough for a device with multiple interfaces. Can policies for merging information be written just based on the characteristics of the interface - say, 3GPP versus 802.11, or IP address of the interface - or

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dhc-container-00

2009-04-11 Thread Michael StJohns
Sorry to stick my oar in, but does this or could this interact with the options specified in RFC3046 in an unexpected way? At 01:41 PM 4/11/2009, Ralph Droms wrote: Scott - even knowing which interface which DHCP information came from may not be enough for a device with multiple interfaces.