[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ltans-dssc-10.txt

2009-08-18 Thread Miguel A. Garcia
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-05

2009-08-18 Thread Cyrus Daboo
Hi Spencer, Thanks for your review - I was on vacation last week so I am only getting around to replying now. --On August 7, 2009 6:36:41 AM -0500 Spencer Dawkins spen...@wonderhamster.org wrote: Comments identified as Spencer (clarity) are provided for editors, but are not part of the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-05

2009-08-18 Thread Ben Campbell
On Aug 16, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Ned Freed wrote: [...] it would be helpful to have a sentence or two somewhere (maybe in the intro) to explicitly say so. My confusion might be around the meaning of the term client in this context. No, I think your confusion is that you read a lot more into

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-06.txt

2009-08-18 Thread Ralph Droms
Russ - would you be willing to clear your DISCUSS and capture Joel's new issues in a COMMENT? - Ralph On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:56 AM 7/27/09, Joel M. Halpern wrote: This document is nearly ready for publication as an Informational RFC. While my comments have been resolved, some minor issues

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-05

2009-08-18 Thread Ned Freed
On Aug 16, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Ned Freed wrote: [...] it would be helpful to have a sentence or two somewhere (maybe in the intro) to explicitly say so. My confusion might be around the meaning of the term client in this context. No, I think your confusion is that you read a lot more