Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt

2009-11-23 Thread Magnus Westerlund
Hi Joel and Jerry, Yes, these are clearly left overs before forcing all the documents into experimental. I commented in AD review about registration rules requiring standards track. Which I believe is fixed, but the comments in the document seems to not have been fixed. Secondly I think we need t

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 23 Nov 2009

2009-11-23 Thread Mary Barnes
Hi all, Here's the link to the new LC assignments for last week's LC assignments (sorry for the delay): http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/reviewers-091119-lc.html The assignments are captured in the spreadsheets: http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/gen-art.html http://www.softarmor

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-04

2009-11-23 Thread Vijay K. Gurbani
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-carpenter-