[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-05

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-behave

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-10.txt

ditto Dave CROCKER wrote: thanks! d/ On 1/11/2010 1:49 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as Informational RFC. ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-10.txt

thanks! d/ On 1/11/2010 1:49 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as Informational RFC. -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/ma

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-10.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-10.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is ready

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-16

Hi Peter, I share your concerns about SBCs modifying SIP messages. That shouldn't happen. If an access network does this they are not providing true Internet service. However, I think it is the actual imposition of the kinds of policies discussed in the draft, rather than the actual mechani

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-protocol-14

Hi, Donald, The changes you propose will address my concerns. Thanks. -Pete Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi Peter, > > > Thanks for the detailed review. See below, > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:13 PM, McCann Peter-A001034 > wrote: > > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Te

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-16

Hi, Dan, I wouldn't want the router/NAT/firewall/SBC to enforce application-specific policies. I think that is actually the root cause of the problem and that box needs to be made transparent. I read through the policy framework that you linked to, and I understand the motivation of some service

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-16

Hi, Gonzalo, I understand that the spec is the result of long discussion in the WG to which I am coming late. My apologies. One of the purposes of the Gen-ART review is to bring up questions that relate to whether the document is a good idea for the Internet as a whole. I share your concerns ab

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework-07.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-mpls-mpls-and-gmpls-security-framework-07.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summa

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-16

Hi Peter, this is something the WG discussed at great length and the conclusion was to have local policies. Note that local policies are also used by the policy framework: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sip-session-policy-framework-06.txt In the WG there were people that, like you, though