Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-10.txt

On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2011-04-10 03:13, Geoff Huston wrote: On 09/04/2011, at 10:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Please see attached review. Thanks Brian, I'm not sure as to the appropriate form of response, but let me respond to the two minor issues you i

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-kitten-digest-to-historic-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-kitten-digest-to-historic-03

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev

On 2011-04-11 09:42, kathleen.moria...@emc.com wrote: > Thank you for the update. How about the following which slightly changes > your proposed text: > >o vCards often carry information that can be sensitive (e.g. > birthday, address, and phone information). Although vCards have no

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev

Hi Simon, Thank you for the update. How about the following which slightly changes your proposed text: o vCards often carry information that can be sensitive (e.g. birthday, address, and phone information). Although vCards have no inherent authentication or privacy provisions,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev

On 2011-04-09 08:03, kathleen.moria...@emc.com wrote: > The last is not a Gen-ART, but was put > there for adding considerations to the security section. I just > meant that it should state that there may be privacy concerns with > some of the information. I listed the regulations to give example

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-harkins-ipsecme-spsk-auth-03 Re