Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-01

Hi Roni, My apologies, I completely missed your review. On 26/04/11 6:22 PM, "Roni Even" wrote: > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Major issues: > > > Minor issues: > This is more out of curiosity > 1. Why not include it in draft-ietf-grow-

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

> From: Doug Barton > IMO one should always expand acronyms the first time they are used. > It adds clarity to the text for new readers, and even for old hands > it's sometimes necessary to disambiguate recycled TLAs. Excellent advice (and points), which I wholly concur with.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

On 05/24/2011 03:15, Adrian Farrel wrote: Thanks Roni, > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Need to expand LDP when first mentioned. LDP is a recognised acronym at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt and does not need to be expanded. And how would someone new to t

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev

Sorry for the delayed response. I would prefer the use of "confidentiality" instead of "privacy" in the paragraph. That would better align with the definitions in RFC 2828. Russ On Apr 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Thank you for the update. How about the following which

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

Hi Adrian, This is up to you reading the abbrev.expansion.txt I noticed that "Some abbreviations are so well known that expansion is probably unnecessary. The RFC Editor exercises editorial judgment about whether a particular use of one of the "well-known" abbreviations requires expansion." So i

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model-27

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-xcon-common-d

Re: [Gen-art] Iffy on review

I hope you get well soon, Scott! The document in Scott's queue is "Detecting Data Plane Failures in Point-to-Multipoint Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) - Extensions to LSP Ping"draft-ietf-mpls-p2mp-lsp-ping ,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

Gotta draw a line somewhere, Doug. (RFC? IMO? IETF?) The RFC Editor draws that line for us. The list at the page I referenced is constructed by the RFC Editor based on input from the community. I'm guessing things can be deleted as well as added. A (stands for Adrian) > -Original Message--

[Gen-art] Iffy on review

I am sick and I don't know when I'll start getting better. There is a straightforward review on my queue. Perhaps someone could take it? Scott -- sent from a tiny screen ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen

[Gen-art] Telechat review: draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardxml-10 Reviewer: Mary Barnes Review Date: 24 May 2011 IESG Telechat Date: 26 May 2011 Summary: Rea

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

Thanks. I will take care of nits 2 & 3 in the next update. Will be ignoring nit #1, as per Adrian's comment. Nitin On 5/24/11 1:11 AM, "Roni Even" wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

Thanks Roni, > Nits/editorial comments: > > 1. Need to expand LDP when first mentioned. LDP is a recognised acronym at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt and does not need to be expanded. Cheers, Adrian ___ Gen-art mailing

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsmap-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-enhanced-dsma