[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-roll-of0-14

2011-06-27 Thread Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-roll-of0-14 Reviewer: Roni

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review for draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-03

2011-06-27 Thread kathleen.moriarty
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp-14

2011-06-27 Thread IJsbrand Wijnands
Hi Joel, Thanks for the comments. > Major issues: >As I read the document, status codes (and stauts TLVs) are for reporting > on the status of LSPs. They are not for negotiating behaviors. Thus, I find > it very strange that make-before-break behavior (section 8) is requested (by > a dow

[Gen-art] TC draft supporting draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt (resent???)

2011-06-27 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Jari, Attached is the TC draft for PMIPv6 ( a new document, ­00 version, with the name draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-tc-mib-00.txt). Based on the IESG inputs, specifically Dan¹s comment, our Editor (Glenn) worked out on the TC draft for PMIPv6. Since, this work is tied to the MIB which was the pr

Re: [Gen-art] TC draft supporting draft-ietf-netlmm-pmipv6-mib-05.txt (resent???)

2011-06-27 Thread Glenn M. Keeni
Hi, To follow-up on Sri's mail, this document does not introduce new material. The textual conventions have been taken out of pmipv6-mib-05.txt and put into a new independent pmipv6-tc-mib-00.txt. The revised pmipv6-mib-06.txt (yet to be posted) refers to pmipv6-tc-mib-00.txt. Glenn (2011/