[Gen-art] Gen-art last call review : draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol-03

2011-10-23 Thread Elwyn Davies
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-deref-protocol-03

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12

2011-10-23 Thread Ned Freed
On 10/20/2011 3:37 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: >> So, if the limit is still 998, then there is no change with respect the former >> limit. > > See the next sentence: > > (Note that in > ASCII octets and characters are effectively the same but this is not > true in UTF-8.) > > Remember, in UTF-8, ch

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12

2011-10-23 Thread John C Klensin
--On Sunday, October 23, 2011 07:11 +0100 Dave CROCKER wrote: > >> Remember, in UTF-8, characters can be multiple octets. So 998 >> UTF-8 encoded *characters* are likely to be many more than >> 998 octets long. So the change is to say that the limit is in >> octets, not in characters. > > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12

2011-10-23 Thread Dave CROCKER
On 10/20/2011 3:37 PM, Pete Resnick wrote: So, if the limit is still 998, then there is no change with respect the former limit. See the next sentence: (Note that in ASCII octets and characters are effectively the same but this is not true in UTF-8.) Remember, in UTF-8, characters can be mul