Hi Tom,
If you change this to Experimental, then the Intro should have a
discussion of the experiment, including some guidance about how to
judge success. The current IESG has been a stickler on that point.
dbh
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom111.tay...@bell.net]
> S
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-s
Hi,
I am OK with minor issue 2 now.
Issue 3 was my only point
Roni
> -Original Message-
> From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kire...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 7:36 PM
> To: Roni Even
> Cc: Kireeti Kompella; draft-kompella-l2vpn-l2vpn@tools.ietf.org;
> gen-art@ietf.org
On Jan 12, 2012, at 23:16 , Roni Even wrote:
> Hi,
> I looked at the 08 version and the major issues are addressed.
> What about minor issue number 3?
Good point! I will fix (as Stewart suggests, maybe just remove the reference).
To your minor issue (2), I've clarified the structure. Do you st
On Jan 13, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
[…]
>
> I think this isn't a protocol requirement, but a
> quality-of-implementation issue. But I do think the document could
> have a paragraph discussing this, and warning of the consequences.
I concur that this is not so much a protocol issue
>>> -- section 3.1, paragraph 4: "Implementations MUST NOT generate errors for
>>> recursive inclusions at upload time, as this would force an upload ordering
>>> requirement upon script authors / generators. However, if an active script
>>> is replaced with a faulty script and would remain the ac
