Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

2012-01-23 Thread Alexey Melnikov
On 19/01/2012 22:05, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Peter, Alexey, all, Hi Brian, On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 1/19/12 10:32 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Brian, On 19/01/2012 09:48, Brian Trammell wrote: On Jan 18, 2012, at 7:01 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: On 18/01

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

2012-01-23 Thread Brian Trammell
Hi, Alexey, one more round (hopefully) :) ... On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> >> Okay; how about the following (including Alexey's comments from the previous >> review, and pointing more specifically to 6125) >> >> RID systems MUST verify the identity of their peers

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

2012-01-23 Thread Alexey Melnikov
On 23/01/2012 14:22, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Alexey, Hi Brian, one more round (hopefully) :) ... On Jan 23, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Okay; how about the following (including Alexey's comments from the previous review, and pointing more specifically to 6125) RID syste

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

2012-01-23 Thread Brian Trammell
Hi, Alexey, I can take the CN-ID question to the MILE WG on this. In any case, is it clear enough from this language that CN-ID is a "compatibility-only" feature? Cheers, Brian On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > On 23/01/2012 14:22, Brian Trammell wrote: >> Hi, Alexey, > Hi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART last call review of draft-ietf-mile-rfc6046-bis-05

2012-01-23 Thread Alexey Melnikov
On 23/01/2012 16:12, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Alexey, Hi Brian, I can take the CN-ID question to the MILE WG on this. Sounds like a good idea. In any case, is it clear enough from this language that CN-ID is a "compatibility-only" feature? I think your text is clear enough. Cheers, Bria

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-vbr-audio-04

2012-01-23 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-srtp-vbr-audio-04 Re

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00

2012-01-23 Thread Martin Thomson
Hi Peter, -02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed. All my concerns were addressed. --Martin On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote: > > Martin, here is my perspective... > > On 12/17/11 ?:46 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > > "It is easy" is not an especially good reason

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00

2012-01-23 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 1/23/12 4:52 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > Hi Peter, > > -02 is a marked improvement over the version I reviewed. All my > concerns were addressed. > > --Martin > > On Jan 18, 2012 8:14 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" > wrote: >> >> Martin, here is my perspective... >> >> O