Please see attached review.
Brian
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before
Thank You, Brian!
Regards,
Christer
-Original Message-
From: gen-art-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Brian E Carpenter
Sent: 5. lokakuuta 2012 16:28
To: draft-ietf-sipcore-proxy-feature@tools.ietf.org; General Area Review
Team
Subject: [Gen-art]
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Dear Joel,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joel M. Halpern
Envoyé : vendredi 5 octobre 2012 17:15
À : A. Jean Mahoney
Cc : softwi...@ietf.org;
Thank you for the prompt followup.
Taking things out of order, if the Discussion section were called
Limitations, I would have understood why it was there. It is not clear
to me that the content actually describes limitations though. It
describes design choices that need to be made in
Pete,
Your Section 4 change looks fine to me, thanks.
The monkey-in-the-middle terminology is Randy's and I will defer to him.
(I've added him to the To:)
--John
On Oct 1, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Pete McCann mc...@petoni.org wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background
