Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-07.txt

Hi Mary, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. Sorry for the delay on this response. From: Mary Barnes mailto:mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:12 AM To: "draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option@tools.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-07.txt

Hi Mary, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. Sorry for the delay on this response. From: Mary Barnes mailto:mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:12 AM To: "draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option@tools.ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-08.txt

Hi Barry, On 01/08/2013 09:17 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > Thinking further: > Which seems to indicate that the character "-" is valid for use and this is followed by the following text at the end of the section " Note that the use of the "-" character to index an array will alwa

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-08.txt

Hi Murray, On 01/08/2013 01:30 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > HI Suresh, > > RFC4627 is already in the downref registry. See > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry. > > The template used is a simplified one being tested by request of the IESG. Thanks for that info.

Re: [Gen-art] [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06

Dear Huub and Loa, my brain did s/Reverese/Remote/ by itself. Indeed, 802.1ag and Y.1731 use RDI for Remote Defect Indication, and nothing in Reverse. And that how draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06 should expand RDI as well. Regards, Greg -Original Message- Fro

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-08.txt

Thinking further: >>> Which seems to indicate that the character "-" is valid for use and this >>> is followed by the following text at the end of the section >>> >>> " Note that the use of the "-" character to index an array will always >>>result in such an error; applications of JSON Pointe

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-pointer-08.txt

Murray is exactly right. And, for what it's worth, the App Area has discussed moving 4627 to Standards Track. The experimental shepherd writeup template is here: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DraftShepherdWriteupWgAlternate ...and I encourage shepherds to talk with your ADs abou

Re: [Gen-art] [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06

I notice too that MEP and MIP are incorrectly expanded:-( Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Huub van Helvoort" To: "Greg Mirsky" Cc: ; ; "Bitar, Nabil N" ; ; Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 9:35 PM Subject: Re: [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06 > Hello

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-09

Hi David, I got your point. What about this text for that paragraph? "The following figure illustrates the format used to describe signed objects in the repository. It reflects the algorithm suites in use, and shows the relationship between three CAs (X, Y, and Z) that form a certificate chain

Re: [Gen-art] [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06

Greg, RFC 6428 expands RDI as: RDI: Remote Defect Indication /Loa On 2013-01-07 21:51, Greg Mirsky wrote: Dear Nabil, can we avoid different interpretation of the same abbreviation (RDI): RDI Remote Defect Indication for Continuity Check Message RDI Reverse Defect Indication

Re: [Gen-art] [PWE3] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk-06

Dear Greg, You responded: > IEEE 802.1ag interprets MEP and MIP as: > > * Maintenance association End Point > * Maintenance domain Intermediate Point Indeed, and MA == MEG, MD == ME. > Y.1731 interprets them as: > > * Maintenance entity group (MEG) End Point > * MEG Intermediate Point